From: Rohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
CKRM-Tech <ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
devel@openvz.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:50:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1158774657.8574.65.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <451173B5.1000805@yahoo.com.au>
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 03:00 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> (this time to the lists as well)
>
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > I'd much rather containterize the whole reclaim code, which should not
> > be too hard since he already adds a container pointer to struct page.
>
>
Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in
such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first
operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But
in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code.
> > I still have to reread what Rohit does for file backed pages, that gave
> > my head a spin.
Please let me know if there is any specific part that isn't making much
sense.
-rohit
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-20 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1158718568.29000.44.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com>
2006-09-20 5:39 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 16:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 16:56 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 17:19 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 18:03 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:40 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-20 16:27 ` Rohit Seth
[not found] ` <1158751720.8970.67.camel@twins>
[not found] ` <4511626B.9000106@yahoo.com.au>
[not found] ` <1158767787.3278.103.camel@taijtu>
2006-09-20 17:00 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:23 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 17:36 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-20 17:30 ` Nick Piggin
2006-09-20 17:50 ` Rohit Seth [this message]
2006-09-20 17:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 18:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-09-20 18:14 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 18:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-09-20 18:33 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 18:38 ` Rohit Seth
2006-09-20 19:48 ` Paul Jackson
2006-09-20 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-09-20 19:51 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2006-09-20 18:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2006-09-20 18:57 ` Rohit Seth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1158774657.8574.65.camel@galaxy.corp.google.com \
--to=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox