linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] page fault retry with NOPAGE_RETRY
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:06:46 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1158710807.6002.219.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060919165906.3d641236.akpm@osdl.org>

On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 16:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:50:35 +1000
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 16:35 -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
> > > Patch attached.
> > > 
> > > As Andrew points out, the logic is a bit hacky and using a flag in 
> > > current->flags to determine whether we have done the retry or not already.
> > > 
> > > I too think the right approach to being able to handle these kinds of 
> > > retries in a more general fashion is to introduce a struct 
> > > pagefault_args along the page faulting path.  Within it, we could 
> > > introduce a reason for the retry so the higher levels would be able to 
> > > better understand what to do.
> > 
> >  .../...
> > 
> > I need to re-read your mail and Andrew as at this point, I don't quite
> > see why we need that args and/or that current->flags bit instead of
> > always returning all the way to userland and let the faulting
> > instruction happen again (which means you don't block in the kernel, can
> > take signals etc...
> 
> That would amount to a busy wait, waiting for the disk IO to complete.
> 
> So we need to go to sleep somewhere (in D state, because we _are_ waiting
> for disk IO).  Returning all the way to userspace and immediately retaking
> the fault is unneeded extra work.

No, I'm not saying immediately... you do the wait thing in filemap.c.
Anyway, see my other message.

> > thus do you actually need to prevent multiple
> > retries ?)
> 
> I expect there are livelock scenarios.  For example, process A could spin
> on posix_fadvise(some libc text page, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED), perhaps causing
> other applications to get permanently stuck in the kernel.

Unless you add a way to handle signals.. see my other mail.

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-20  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-14 22:55 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-15  0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-15  7:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-15  7:35   ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-15 13:30     ` Hugh Dickins
2006-09-16  1:03       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-19 23:35   ` Mike Waychison
2006-09-19 23:50     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-19 23:59       ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-20  0:06         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2006-09-20  0:05       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-20  0:21         ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-20  1:57           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-20  3:05             ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-20  5:04               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-20  5:26                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-20  6:54                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-20 17:53                     ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-21 22:05                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-21 22:41                         ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-21 23:09                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-23 14:21                       ` Hugh Dickins
2006-09-23 19:46                         ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-23 22:35                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-20  5:06               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-20  1:14       ` Mike Waychison
2006-09-20  2:02         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-15 21:35 ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1158710807.6002.219.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox