From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] radix-tree: cleanup radix_tree_deref_slot() and _lookup_slot() comments
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:50:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1156359008.5159.36.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060823105144.eccd3cbf.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 10:51 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:32:52 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
>
> > '_deref_slot() function, and adds more explanation of expected/required
> > locking to the direct slot access functions. I separated it out,
> > because it doesn't fix a serious bug, like the previous one.
> >
> > Paul: do you agree that we don't need rcu_dereference() in the
> > _deref_slot() as it can only be used while the tree is held [probably
> > write] locked? Do the comments look OK?
> >
> > Lee
> >
> > Cleanup radix tree slot dereference and lookup comments - 2.6.18-rc4-mm2
> >
> > radix_tree_deref_slot() was actually dereferencing the pointer
> > in the assignment to the local variable 'slot' and then
> > rcu_dereference()ing the results of an expression [return value
> > of an inline function].
> >
> > Because we must hold the tree locked across lookup_slot() and
> > _deref_slot(), we don't need the rcu_dereference() at all.
> >
> > Added comments specifying required locking for _lookup_slot()
> > and _deref_slot().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
> >
> >
> > include/linux/radix-tree.h | 9 +++++++--
> > lib/radix-tree.c | 5 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/lib/radix-tree.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2.orig/lib/radix-tree.c 2006-08-22 14:47:06.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/lib/radix-tree.c 2006-08-22 14:48:01.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -336,7 +336,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_insert);
> > * @root. This is useful for update-if-exists operations.
> > *
> > * This function cannot be called under rcu_read_lock, it must be
> > - * excluded from writers, as must the returned slot.
> > + * excluded from writers, as must the returned slot for subsequent
> > + * use by radix_tree_deref_slot() and radix_tree_replace slot.
> > + * Caller must hold tree write locked across slot lookup and
> > + * replace.
> > */
> > void **radix_tree_lookup_slot(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned long index)
> > {
> > Index: linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/include/linux/radix-tree.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2.orig/include/linux/radix-tree.h 2006-08-22 14:47:45.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/include/linux/radix-tree.h 2006-08-22 14:48:54.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -122,12 +122,17 @@ do { \
> > /**
> > * radix_tree_deref_slot - dereference a slot
> > * @pslot: pointer to slot, returned by radix_tree_lookup_slot
> > - * @returns: item that was stored in that slot.
> > + * @returns: item that was stored in that slot with any direct pointer flag
> > + * removed.
>
> I realize that you are just changing what was already there, but
> the @returns kernel-doc notation indicates that <returns> is a function
> parameter, but it's not, so please just make it like so:
>
> * Returns: <text>
Ah, yes. Laziness exacerbated by cluelessness [or vice versa]...
How about the attached patch? Applies atop my previous 2 radix tree
patches [fix and cleanup]. Addresses Christoph's comment, as well.
Lee
Cleanup radix_tree_{deref|replace}_slot() calling conventions.
Adopt Christoph's suggestion to change calling conventions
of radix_tree_replace_slot(). Make similar change to
radix_tree_defer_slot().
Both now take a 'void **pslot' argument. Not only does this
simplify the code of these two functions, but the arg type
now matches the return type of radix_tree_lookup_slot().
Tested with reverted page migration, but I don't know that I
was exercising any direct pointers.
Note: this will require changes to migrate_page_move_mapping()
to avoid compiler warnings if/when we back out the work around
patch for the problem in '_replace_slot() fixed by a prior patch.
The migrate code is [will then be] the only user of the direct
slot replacement APIs.
Also, fix '_deref_slot() and '_lookup_slot() return comments
for Randy.
Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
include/linux/radix-tree.h | 14 ++++++--------
lib/radix-tree.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/include/linux/radix-tree.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2.orig/include/linux/radix-tree.h 2006-08-23 11:28:37.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/include/linux/radix-tree.h 2006-08-23 14:08:59.000000000 -0400
@@ -122,17 +122,16 @@ do { \
/**
* radix_tree_deref_slot - dereference a slot
* @pslot: pointer to slot, returned by radix_tree_lookup_slot
- * @returns: item that was stored in that slot with any direct pointer flag
+ * Returns: item that was stored in that slot with any direct pointer flag
* removed.
*
* For use with radix_tree_lookup_slot(). Caller must hold tree at least read
* locked across slot lookup and dereference. More likely, will be used with
* radix_tree_replace_slot(), as well, so caller will hold tree write locked.
*/
-static inline void *radix_tree_deref_slot(void *pslot)
+static inline void *radix_tree_deref_slot(void **pslot)
{
- void *slot = *(void **)pslot;
- return radix_tree_direct_to_ptr(slot);
+ return radix_tree_direct_to_ptr(*pslot);
}
/**
* radix_tree_replace_slot - replace item in a slot
@@ -142,13 +141,12 @@ static inline void *radix_tree_deref_slo
* For use with radix_tree_lookup_slot(). Caller must hold tree write locked
* across slot lookup and replacement.
*/
-static inline void radix_tree_replace_slot(void *pslot, void *item)
+static inline void radix_tree_replace_slot(void **pslot, void *item)
{
- void *slot = *(void **)pslot;
BUG_ON(radix_tree_is_direct_ptr(item));
- rcu_assign_pointer(*(void **)pslot,
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*pslot,
(void *)((unsigned long)item |
- ((unsigned long)slot & RADIX_TREE_DIRECT_PTR)));
+ ((unsigned long)*pslot & RADIX_TREE_DIRECT_PTR)));
}
int radix_tree_insert(struct radix_tree_root *, unsigned long, void *);
Index: linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/lib/radix-tree.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2.orig/lib/radix-tree.c 2006-08-22 14:51:38.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm2/lib/radix-tree.c 2006-08-23 14:12:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -332,8 +332,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(radix_tree_insert);
* @root: radix tree root
* @index: index key
*
- * Lookup the slot corresponding to the position @index in the radix tree
- * @root. This is useful for update-if-exists operations.
+ * Returns: the slot corresponding to the position @index in the
+ * radix tree @root. This is useful for update-if-exists operations.
*
* This function cannot be called under rcu_read_lock, it must be
* excluded from writers, as must the returned slot for subsequent
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-23 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-22 20:32 Lee Schermerhorn
2006-08-23 17:51 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-08-23 18:50 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2006-08-23 19:06 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-08-24 5:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-08-24 15:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2006-08-26 5:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1156359008.5159.36.camel@localhost \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox