linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: "Abu M. Muttalib" <abum@aftek.com>
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: RE: Relation between free() and remove_vm_struct()
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:48:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155811716.4494.51.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BKEKJNIHLJDCFGDBOHGMKEEMDGAA.abum@aftek.com>

On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:26 +0530, Abu M. Muttalib wrote:
> Hi Arjan,
> 
> Thnax for your reply.
> 
> > second of all, glibc delays freeing of some memory (in the brk() area)
> > to optimize for cases of frequent malloc/free operations, so that it
> > doesn't have to go to the kernel all the time (and a free would imply a
> > cross cpu TLB invalidate which is *expensive*, so batching those up is a
> > really good thing for performance)
> 
> As per my observation, in two scenarios that I have tried, in one scenario I
> am able to see the prints from remove_vm_struct(), but in the other
> scenario, I don't see any prints from remove_vm_strcut().
> 
> My question is, if there is delayed freeing of virtual address space, it
> should be the same in both the scenarios, but its not the case, and this
> behavior is consistent for my two scenarios, i.e.. in one I am able to see
> the kernel prints and in other I am not, respectively.

I'm sorry but you're not providing enough information for me to
understand your follow-on question.

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven

> 
-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-17 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-17  6:59 Abu M. Muttalib
2006-08-17  6:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-17  7:56   ` Abu M. Muttalib
2006-08-17 10:48     ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-08-17 11:27       ` Abu M. Muttalib
2006-08-18 11:43         ` Andy Whitcroft

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1155811716.4494.51.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=abum@aftek.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox