Re: [PATCH] Register sysfs file for hotpluged new node

[Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>]

On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 21:23 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> +int arch_register_node(int num){
> +       int p_node;
> +       struct node *parent = NULL;
> +
> +       if (!node_online(num))
> +               return 0;
> +       p_node = parent_node(num);
> +
> +       if (p_node != num)
> +               parent = &node_devices[p_node].node;
> +
> +       return register_node(&node_devices[num].node, num, parent);
> +}
> +
> +void arch_unregister_node(int num)
> +{
> +       unregister_node(&node_devices[num].node);
> +}
...
> +int arch_register_node(int i)
> +{
> +       int error = 0;
> +
> +       if (node_online(i)){
> +               int p_node = parent_node(i);
> +               struct node *parent = NULL;
> +
> +               if (p_node != i)
> +                       parent = &node_devices[p_node];
> +               error = register_node(&node_devices[i], i, parent);
> +       }
> +
> +       return error;
> +} 

While you're at it, can you consolidate these two functions?  I don't
see too much of a reason for keeping them separate.  You can probably
also kill the 'struct i386_node' since it is just a 'struct node'
wrapper anyway.  

I promise not to complain if you fix the i386 function's braces, too. ;)

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>