linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] mm: Support huge pfnmaps
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:05:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147332f-790e-487f-8816-1860b8744ab2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zr5VA6QSBHO3rpS8@x1n>



On 2024/8/16 3:20, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 09:37:15AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> Currently, only x86_64 (1G+2M) and arm64 (2M) are supported.
>>
>> There is definitely interest here in extending ARM to support the 1G
>> size too, what is missing?
> 
> Currently PUD pfnmap relies on THP_PUD config option:
> 
> config ARCH_SUPPORTS_PUD_PFNMAP
> 	def_bool y
> 	depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGE_PFNMAP && HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD
> 
> Arm64 unfortunately doesn't yet support dax 1G, so not applicable yet.
> 
> Ideally, pfnmap is too simple comparing to real THPs and it shouldn't
> require to depend on THP at all, but we'll need things like below to land
> first:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240717220219.3743374-1-peterx@redhat.com
> 
> I sent that first a while ago, but I didn't collect enough inputs, and I
> decided to unblock this series from that, so x86_64 shouldn't be affected,
> and arm64 will at least start to have 2M.
> 
>>
>>> The other trick is how to allow gup-fast working for such huge mappings
>>> even if there's no direct sign of knowing whether it's a normal page or
>>> MMIO mapping.  This series chose to keep the pte_special solution, so that
>>> it reuses similar idea on setting a special bit to pfnmap PMDs/PUDs so that
>>> gup-fast will be able to identify them and fail properly.
>>
>> Make sense
>>
>>> More architectures / More page sizes
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Currently only x86_64 (2M+1G) and arm64 (2M) are supported.
>>>
>>> For example, if arm64 can start to support THP_PUD one day, the huge pfnmap
>>> on 1G will be automatically enabled.

A draft patch to enable THP_PUD on arm64, only passed with 
DEBUG_VM_PGTABLE, we may test pud pfnmaps on arm64.

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index a2f8ff354ca6..ff0d27c72020 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ config ARM64
  	select HAVE_ARCH_THREAD_STRUCT_WHITELIST
  	select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
  	select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
+	select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD if PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
  	select HAVE_ARCH_VMAP_STACK
  	select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
  	select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h 
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 7a4f5604be3f..e013fe458476 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -763,6 +763,25 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_page_vaddr(pmd_t pmd)
  #define pud_valid(pud)		pte_valid(pud_pte(pud))
  #define pud_user(pud)		pte_user(pud_pte(pud))
  #define pud_user_exec(pud)	pte_user_exec(pud_pte(pud))
+#define pud_dirty(pud)		pte_dirty(pud_pte(pud))
+#define pud_devmap(pud)		pte_devmap(pud_pte(pud))
+#define pud_wrprotect(pud)	pte_pud(pte_wrprotect(pud_pte(pud)))
+#define pud_mkold(pud)		pte_pud(pte_mkold(pud_pte(pud)))
+#define pud_mkwrite(pud)	pte_pud(pte_mkwrite_novma(pud_pte(pud)))
+#define pud_mkclean(pud)	pte_pud(pte_mkclean(pud_pte(pud)))
+#define pud_mkdirty(pud)	pte_pud(pte_mkdirty(pud_pte(pud)))
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD
+static inline int pud_trans_huge(pud_t pud)
+{
+	return pud_val(pud) && pud_present(pud) && !(pud_val(pud) & 
PUD_TABLE_BIT);
+}
+
+static inline pud_t pud_mkdevmap(pud_t pud)
+{
+	return pte_pud(set_pte_bit(pud_pte(pud), __pgprot(PTE_DEVMAP)));
+}
+#endif

  static inline bool pgtable_l4_enabled(void);

@@ -1137,10 +1156,20 @@ static inline int pmdp_set_access_flags(struct 
vm_area_struct *vma,
  							pmd_pte(entry), dirty);
  }

+static inline int pudp_set_access_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					unsigned long address, pud_t *pudp,
+					pud_t entry, int dirty)
+{
+	return __ptep_set_access_flags(vma, address, (pte_t *)pudp,
+							pud_pte(entry), dirty);
+}
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD
  static inline int pud_devmap(pud_t pud)
  {
  	return 0;
  }
+#endif

  static inline int pgd_devmap(pgd_t pgd)
  {
@@ -1213,6 +1242,13 @@ static inline int 
pmdp_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  {
  	return __ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, address, (pte_t *)pmdp);
  }
+
+static inline int pudp_test_and_clear_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					    unsigned long address,
+					    pud_t *pudp)
+{
+	return __ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, address, (pte_t *)pudp);
+}
  #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */

  static inline pte_t __ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -1433,6 +1469,7 @@ static inline void update_mmu_cache_range(struct 
vm_fault *vmf,
  #define update_mmu_cache(vma, addr, ptep) \
  	update_mmu_cache_range(NULL, vma, addr, ptep, 1)
  #define update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, address, pmd) do { } while (0)
+#define update_mmu_cache_pud(vma, address, pud) do { } while (0)

  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52
  #define phys_to_ttbr(addr)	(((addr) | ((addr) >> 46)) & 
TTBR_BADDR_MASK_52)
-- 
2.27.0


>>
>> Oh that sounds like a bigger step..
> 
> Just to mention, no real THP 1G needed here for pfnmaps.  The real gap here
> is only about the pud helpers that only exists so far with CONFIG_THP_PUD
> in huge_memory.c.
> 
>>   
>>> VFIO is so far the only consumer for the huge pfnmaps after this series
>>> applied.  Besides above remap_pfn_range() generic optimization, device
>>> driver can also try to optimize its mmap() on a better VA alignment for
>>> either PMD/PUD sizes.  This may, iiuc, normally require userspace changes,
>>> as the driver doesn't normally decide the VA to map a bar.  But I don't
>>> think I know all the drivers to know the full picture.
>>
>> How does alignment work? In most caes I'm aware of the userspace does
>> not use MAP_FIXED so the expectation would be for the kernel to
>> automatically select a high alignment. I suppose your cases are
>> working because qemu uses MAP_FIXED and naturally aligns the BAR
>> addresses?
>>
>>> - x86_64 + AMD GPU
>>>    - Needs Alex's modified QEMU to guarantee proper VA alignment to make
>>>      sure all pages to be mapped with PUDs
>>
>> Oh :(
> 
> So I suppose this answers above. :) Yes, alignment needed.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-16  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-09 16:08 Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:08 ` [PATCH 01/19] mm: Introduce ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGE_PFNMAP and special bits to pmd/pud Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 17:16     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-09 18:06       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 16:08 ` [PATCH 02/19] mm: Drop is_huge_zero_pud() Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:34   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-14 12:38   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-09 16:08 ` [PATCH 03/19] mm: Mark special bits for huge pfn mappings when inject Peter Xu
2024-08-14 12:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 15:23     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-14 15:53       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-09 16:08 ` [PATCH 04/19] mm: Allow THP orders for PFNMAPs Peter Xu
2024-08-14 12:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-09 16:08 ` [PATCH 05/19] mm/gup: Detect huge pfnmap entries in gup-fast Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 16:59     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-14 12:42       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 15:34         ` Peter Xu
2024-08-14 12:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-09 16:08 ` [PATCH 07/19] mm/fork: Accept huge pfnmap entries Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:32   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 17:15     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-09 17:59       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-12 18:29         ` Peter Xu
2024-08-12 18:50           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-12 19:05             ` Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:08 ` [PATCH 08/19] mm: Always define pxx_pgprot() Peter Xu
2024-08-14 13:09   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 15:43     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:08 ` [PATCH 09/19] mm: New follow_pfnmap API Peter Xu
2024-08-14 13:19   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 18:24     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-14 22:14       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-15 15:41         ` Peter Xu
2024-08-15 16:16           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-15 17:21             ` Peter Xu
2024-08-15 17:24               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-15 18:52                 ` Peter Xu
2024-08-16 23:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-17 11:05     ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-21 19:10     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 10/19] KVM: Use " Peter Xu
2024-08-09 17:23   ` Axel Rasmussen
2024-08-12 18:58     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-12 22:47       ` Axel Rasmussen
2024-08-12 23:44         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 13:15           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 14:23             ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 11/19] s390/pci_mmio: " Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 12/19] mm/x86/pat: Use the new " Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 13/19] vfio: " Peter Xu
2024-08-14 13:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 14/19] acrn: " Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 15/19] mm/access_process_vm: " Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 16/19] mm: Remove follow_pte() Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 17/19] mm/x86: Support large pfn mappings Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 18/19] mm/arm64: " Peter Xu
2024-08-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 19/19] vfio/pci: Implement huge_fault support Peter Xu
2024-08-14 13:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 16:08     ` Alex Williamson
2024-08-14 16:24       ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found] ` <20240809160909.1023470-7-peterx@redhat.com>
2024-08-09 16:20   ` [PATCH 06/19] mm/pagewalk: Check pfnmap early for folio_walk_start() David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 16:54     ` Peter Xu
2024-08-09 17:25       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-09 21:37         ` Peter Xu
2024-08-14 13:05         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-16  9:30           ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-16 14:21             ` Peter Xu
2024-08-16 17:38               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 18:42                 ` Peter Xu
2024-08-16 17:56               ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-19 12:19                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-19 14:19                   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-09 18:12 ` [PATCH 00/19] mm: Support huge pfnmaps David Hildenbrand
2024-08-14 12:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 14:35   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 14:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-08-14 14:43     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 20:54       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 22:00         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-14 22:10         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-14 23:36           ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-14 23:27         ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-14 23:38           ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-15  0:23             ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-15 19:20   ` Peter Xu
2024-08-16  3:05     ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2024-08-16 14:33       ` Peter Xu
2024-08-19 13:14         ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1147332f-790e-487f-8816-1860b8744ab2@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox