From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Stone Wang <pwstone@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][5/8] proc: export mlocked pages info through "/proc/meminfo: Wired"
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:43:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1142977393.10906.204.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc56f2f0603200537i7b2492a6p@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 08:37 -0500, Stone Wang wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.15.orig/include/linux/mm.h 2006-01-02 22:21:10.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.15/include/linux/mm.h 2006-03-07 01:49:12.000000000 -0500
> @@ -218,6 +221,10 @@
> unsigned long flags; /* Atomic flags, some possibly
> * updated asynchronously */
> atomic_t _count; /* Usage count, see below. */
> + unsigned short wired_count; /* Count of wirings of the page.
> + * If not zero,the page would be SetPageWired,
> + * and put on Wired list of the zone.
> + */
> atomic_t _mapcount; /* Count of ptes mapped in mms,
> * to show when page is mapped
> * & limit reverse map searches.
We're usually pretty picky about adding stuff to 'struct page'. It
_just_ fits inside a cacheline on most 32-bit architectures.
Can this wired_count not be derived at runtime? It seems like it would
be possible to run through all VMAs mapping the page, and determining
how many of them are VM_LOCKED. Would that be too slow?
Also, does it matter how many times it is locked, or just that
_somebody_ has it locked?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-21 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-20 13:37 Stone Wang
2006-03-21 12:21 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-21 15:33 ` Stone Wang
2006-03-21 19:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-22 0:22 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-22 5:37 ` Stone Wang
2006-03-22 7:23 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-22 9:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-24 16:34 ` Rik van Riel
2006-03-24 16:38 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-24 18:19 ` Rik van Riel
2006-03-24 18:25 ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-21 21:43 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2006-03-22 6:02 ` Stone Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1142977393.10906.204.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pwstone@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox