From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB20DAKc001776 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:13:10 -0500 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jB20CaSI066506 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:12:36 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB20D98C009874 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:13:10 -0700 Subject: Re: Better pagecache statistics ? From: Badari Pulavarty In-Reply-To: References: <1133377029.27824.90.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051201152029.GA14499@dmt.cnet> <20051201160044.GB14499@dmt.cnet> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:13:20 -0800 Message-Id: <1133482400.21429.69.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-mm , lkml List-ID: On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 13:16 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > We are actually looking at have better pagecache statistics and I have > been trying out a series of approaches. The direct need right now is to > have some statistics on the size of the pagecache and the number of > unmapped file backed pages per node. > Cool. I would be interested in it. Where are you collecting the statistics ? Thanks, Badari -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org