Re: Better pagecache statistics ?

[Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>]

On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > I thought that it would be easy to use SystemTap for a such
> > > a purpose?
> > > 
> > > The sys_read/sys_write example at 
> > > http://www.redhat.com/magazine/011sep05/features/systemtap/ sounds
> > > interesting.
> > > 
> > > What I'm I missing?
> > 
> > Well, Few things:
> > 
> > 1) We have to have those probes present in the system all the time
> > collecting the information when read/write happens, maintaining it
> > and spitting it out. Since its kernel probe, all this data will be
> > in the kernel. 
> 
> Yeah, there is some overhead.
> 
> > 2) If we want to do this accounting (and you don't have those probes
> > installed already) - we can't capture what happened earlier. 
> 
> I suppose that the vast majority of situations where such information is 
> needed are special anyway? 
> 
> Why do you need it around all the time?

Otherwise, we need to insert hooks and ask the customer to reproduce
the problem :(

> > 3) probing sys_read/sys_write() are going to tell you how much
> > a data a process did read or wrote - but its not going to tell you
> > how much is in the cache (now or 10 minutes later). 
> 
> Sure, that was just an example - need to insert probes
> on the correct places.


Okay, I miss understood.


Thanks,
Badari

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>