Re: [PATCH]: Free pages from local pcp lists under tight memory conditions

[Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 13:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think Martin was able to demonstrate much benefit from the lock
> > > contention reduction on 16-way NUMAQ either.
> > > 
> > > So I dithered for months and it was a marginal merge, so it's appropriate
> > > to justify the continued presence of the code.
> > > 
> > 
> > May be the limits on the number of pages hanging on the per_cpu_pagelist
> > was (or even now is) too small (for them to give any meaningful gain).
> > May be we should have more physical contiguity in each of these pcps to
> > give better cache spread.  
> 
> Could be.  The initial settings were pretty arbitrary - I assumed that
> someone would get in and tune them up, but nothing much happened.  Perhaps
> we should expose the thresholds in /proc/sys/vm so they're easier to play
> with.

Most certainly.  If I had a patch ready...I would have given you one
right away :-)  Though I will work on it...

It surely is unfortunate that we have not digged deeper into this area
(in terms of optimizations)....  

-rohit

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>