From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j97DQNdk031104 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:26:23 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j97DSDvl495786 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 07:28:13 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j97DSDjJ028647 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 07:28:13 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: srat and numaq cleanup From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: References: <20051005083846.4308.37575.sendpatchset@cherry.local> <1128530262.26009.27.camel@localhost> <1128610585.8401.15.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:28:06 -0700 Message-Id: <1128691686.8401.45.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Magnus Damm Cc: Magnus Damm , linux-mm List-ID: On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:54 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > > get_zholes_size_numaq() is *ALWAYS* empty/false, right? There's no > need > > to have a stub for it. > > That is correct. I just kept it there to make the srat and numaq code > more similar, but I'd be happy to remove it. If you still consider > this as a cleanup, please let me know and I will generate a new patch. I'd pull it. No need to add new code just for parity. Thanks, -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org