From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Rename PageChecked as PageMiscFS From: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: <200508110857.06539.phillips@arcor.de> References: <42F57FCA.9040805@yahoo.com.au> <200508110823.53593.phillips@arcor.de> <1123713258.10292.109.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <200508110857.06539.phillips@arcor.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:23:56 -0400 Message-Id: <1123716236.8082.12.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Hugh Dickins , David Howells List-ID: to den 11.08.2005 Klokka 08:57 (+1000) skreiv Daniel Phillips: > > What "NFS-related colliding use of page flags bit 8"? > > As explained to me: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112368417412580&w=2 Oh. You are talking about CacheFS? That hasn't been declared "ready to merge" yet. That said, is it really safe to use any flags other than PG_lock/PG_writeback there, David? I can't see that you want to allow other tasks to modify or free the page while you are writing it to the local cache. Cheers, Trond -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org