On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 15:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 14:24 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ext2 is incredibly better. Machine is very responsive. 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > OK.  Please, always monitor and send /proc/meminfo.  I assume that the
> > > dirty-memory clamping is working OK with ext2 and that perhaps it'll work
> > > OK with ext3/data=writeback.
> > 
> > Nope. Dirty is still very high..
> 
> That's a relief in a way.  Can you please try decreasing the number of
> filesystems now?

Here is the data with 5 ext2 filesystems. I also collected /proc/meminfo
every 5 seconds. As you can see, we seem to dirty 6GB of data in 20
seconds of starting the test. I am not sure if its bad, since we have
lots of free memory..

Thanks,
Badari