From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j6QL627K051154 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:06:02 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j6QL64uN177114 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:06:04 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6QL61BV030159 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:06:01 -0600 Subject: Re: Memory pressure handling with iSCSI From: Badari Pulavarty In-Reply-To: References: <1122399331.6433.29.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:05:49 -0700 Message-Id: <1122411949.6433.50.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rik van Riel Cc: lkml , linux-mm , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:59 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > After KS & OLS discussions about memory pressure, I wanted to re-do > > iSCSI testing with "dd"s to see if we are throttling writes. > > Could you also try with shared writable mmap, to see if that > works ok or triggers a deadlock ? I can, but lets finish addressing one issue at a time. Last time, I changed too many things at the same time and got no where :( Thanks, Badari -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org