From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 2/6] CKRM: Core framework support In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:50:17 -0700" <1119905417.14910.22.camel@linuxchandra> References: <1119905417.14910.22.camel@linuxchandra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:22:21 +0900 Message-Id: <1120008141.723898.2904.nullmailer@yamt.dyndns.org> From: YAMAMOTO Takashi Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: sekharan@us.ibm.com Cc: ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > > > + if (pud_none(*pud)) > > > + return 0; > > > + BUG_ON(pud_bad(*pud)); > > > + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address); > > > + pgd_end = (address + PGDIR_SIZE) & PGDIR_MASK; > > > > why didn't you introduce class_migrate_pud? > > Because there is no list to iterate through. i don't understand what you mean. why you don't iterate pud, while you iterate pgdir and pmd? YAMAMOTO Takashi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org