From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Ray Bryant <raybry@sgi.com>
Cc: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ray Bryant <raybry@austin.rr.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
lhms <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 4/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- add-sys_migrate_pages-rc3.patch
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:23:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1119461013.18457.61.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050622163934.25515.22804.81297@tomahawk.engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 09:39 -0700, Ray Bryant wrote:
> +asmlinkage long
> +sys_migrate_pages(pid_t pid, __u32 count, __u32 *old_nodes, __u32 *new_nodes)
> +{
Should the buffers be marked __user?
> + if ((count < 1) || (count > MAX_NUMNODES))
> + return -EINVAL;
Since you have an out_einval:, it's probably best to use it
consistently. There is another place or two like this.
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + int n;
> +
> + n = tmp_old_nodes[i];
> + if ((n < 0) || (n >= MAX_NUMNODES))
> + goto out_einval;
> + node_set(n, old_node_mask);
> +
> + n = tmp_new_nodes[i];
> + if ((n < 0) || (n >= MAX_NUMNODES) || !node_online(n))
> + goto out_einval;
> + node_set(n, new_node_mask);
> +
> + }
I know it's a simple operation, but I think I'd probably break out the
array validation into its own function.
Then, replace the above loop with this:
if (!migrate_masks_valid(tmp_old_nodes, count) ||
migrate_masks_valid(tmp_old_nodes, count))
goto out_einval;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
node_set(tmp_old_nodes[i], old_node_mask);
node_set(tmp_new_nodes[i], new_node_mask);
}
> +static int
> +migrate_vma(struct task_struct *task, struct mm_struct *mm,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, int *node_map)
...
> + spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
> + for (vaddr = vma->vm_start; vaddr < vma->vm_end; vaddr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + page = follow_page(mm, vaddr, 0);
> + /*
> + * follow_page has been known to return pages with zero mapcount
> + * and NULL mapping. Skip those pages as well
> + */
> + if (page && page_mapcount(page)) {
> + if (node_map[page_to_nid(page)] >= 0) {
> + if (steal_page_from_lru(page_zone(page), page,
> + &page_list))
> + count++;
> + else
> + BUG();
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
Personally, I dislike having so many embedded ifs, especially in a for
loop like that. I think it's a lot more logical to code it up as a
series of continues, mostly because it's easy to read a continue as,
"skip this page." You can't always see that as easily with an if(). It
also makes it so that you don't have to wrap the steal_page_from_lru()
call across two lines, which is super-ugly. :)
for (vaddr = vma->vm_start; vaddr < vma->vm_end; vaddr += PAGE_SIZE) {
page = follow_page(mm, vaddr, 0);
if (!page || !page_mapcount(page))
continue;
if (node_map[page_to_nid(page)] < 0)
continue;
if (steal_page_from_lru(page_zone(page), page, &page_list));
count++;
else
BUG();
}
The same kind of thing goes for this if:
> + /* call the page migration code to move the pages */
> + if (count) {
> + nr_busy = try_to_migrate_pages(&page_list, node_map);
> +
> + if (nr_busy < 0)
> + return nr_busy;
> +
> + if (nr_busy == 0)
> + return count;
> +
> + /* return the unmigrated pages to the LRU lists */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(page, page2, &page_list, lru)
> {
> + list_del(&page->lru);
> + putback_page_to_lru(page_zone(page), page);
> + }
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
It looks a lot cleaner if you just do
if (!count)
return count;
... contents of the if(){} block go here
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-22 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-22 16:39 [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 0/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- overview Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 1/10] mm: hirokazu-steal_page_from_lru.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 2/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- xfs-migrate-page-rc3.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 17:30 ` [Lhms-devel] " Joel Schopp
2005-06-23 4:01 ` Nathan Scott
2005-06-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 3/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- add-node_map-arg-to-try_to_migrate_pages-rc3.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 4/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- add-sys_migrate_pages-rc3.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 17:23 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-06-23 1:34 ` Ray Bryant
2005-06-23 1:42 ` Dave Hansen
2005-06-25 10:32 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2005-06-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 5/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- sys_migrate_pages-mempolicy-migration-rc3.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-23 1:51 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-23 20:59 ` [Lhms-devel] " Ray Bryant
2005-06-23 21:05 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-25 5:11 ` Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 6/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- add-mempolicy-control-rc3.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 16:39 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 7/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- sys_migrate_pages-migration-selection-rc3.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 16:40 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 8/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- sys_migrate_pages-cpuset-support-rc3.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 16:40 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 9/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- sys_migrate_pages-permissions-check-rc3.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-22 16:40 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 10/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- N1.2-add-nodemap-to-try_to_migrate_pages-call.patch Ray Bryant
2005-06-23 21:31 ` [PATCH 2.6.12-rc5 0/10] mm: manual page migration-rc3 -- overview Christoph Lameter
2005-06-23 23:00 ` Ray Bryant
2005-06-23 23:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-24 14:15 ` [Lhms-devel] " Ray Bryant
2005-06-24 15:41 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1119461013.18457.61.camel@localhost \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=raybry@austin.rr.com \
--cc=raybry@sgi.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox