From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] Virtual NUMA machine and CKRM In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 May 2005 22:16:13 +0900 (JST)" <20050527.221613.78716667.taka@valinux.co.jp> References: <20050527.221613.78716667.taka@valinux.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 14:28:19 +0900 Message-Id: <1117603699.326265.4138.nullmailer@yamt.dyndns.org> From: YAMAMOTO Takashi Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: taka@valinux.co.jp Cc: ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: hi, > Why don't you implement CKRM memory controller as virtual NUMA > node. i think that you need to describe what's a "virtual NUMA node" before soliciting comments. > I think what you want do is almost what NUMA code does, which > restricts resources to use. If you define virtual NUMA node with > some memory and some virtual CPUs, you can just assign target jobs > to them. because resource restrictions from numa and ckrm are very different, i don't think there is a single effective structure for both of them. YAMAMOTO Takashi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org