From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: page flags ?
Date: 18 May 2005 15:42:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1116456143.26913.1303.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050518145644.717afc21.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 14:56, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know what this page-flag is used for ? I see some
> > references to this in AFS.
> >
> > Is it possible for me to use this for my own use in ext3 ?
> > (like delayed allocations ?) Any generic routines/VM stuff
> > expects me to use this only for a specific purpose ?
> >
> > #define PG_fs_misc 9 /* Filesystem specific bit */
> >
>
> It's identical to PG_checked, added by David Howells'
> provide-a-filesystem-specific-syncable-page-bit.patch
>
> IIRC we decided to expand the definition of PG_checked to mean
> "a_ops-private, fs-defined page flag". I guess if/when that patch is
> merged we'll do a kernel-wide s/PG_checked/PG_fs_misc/.
>
> And ext3 is already using that flag.
:(
Is it possible to get yet another PG_fs_specific flag ?
Reasons for it are:
- I need this for supporting delayed allocation on ext3. Me, Ted
and Suparna thought about it for a while to see we can
workaround it. So far, I haven't found a clean way.
- useful for other folks currently overloading page->private
for this purpose. May be then, we can make most filesystems
use mpage routines (since they assume page->private is for
bufferheads ?)
Thanks,
Badari
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-18 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-18 21:13 Badari Pulavarty
2005-05-18 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-18 22:42 ` Badari Pulavarty [this message]
2005-05-18 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-19 0:09 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-05-19 0:26 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2005-05-19 1:36 ` Dave Hansen
2005-05-19 10:51 ` Andy Whitcroft
2005-05-19 11:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-19 14:37 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-05-19 18:29 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-05-19 22:53 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-19 23:34 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-05-20 0:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-05-19 23:55 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-05-20 0:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-05-18 23:57 ` Bryan Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1116456143.26913.1303.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox