Re: NUMA aware slab allocator V2

[Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>]

On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 04:37 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > The definition for the number of NUMA nodes is dependent on
> > > CONFIG_FLATMEM instead of CONFIG_NUMA in mm.
> > > CONFIG_FLATMEM is not set on ppc64 because CONFIG_DISCONTIG is set! And
> > > consequently nodes exist in a non NUMA config.
> >
> > I was testing 2.6.12-rc4 base.
> 
> There we still have the notion of nodes depending on CONFIG_DISCONTIG and
> not on CONFIG_NUMA. The node stuff needs to be
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
> 
> or
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_DISCONTIG

I think I found the problem.  Could you try the attached patch?

As I said before FLATMEM is really referring to things like the
mem_map[] or max_mapnr.

CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES is what gets turned on for DISCONTIG or for
NUMA.  We'll slowly be removing all of the DISCONTIG cases, so
eventually it will merge back to be one with NUMA.

-- Dave

--- clean/include/linux/numa.h.orig	2005-05-13 06:44:56.000000000 -0700
+++ clean/include/linux/numa.h	2005-05-13 06:52:05.000000000 -0700
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/config.h>
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_FLATMEM
+#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
 #include <asm/numnodes.h>
 #endif
 


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>