From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] CKRM: Basic changes to the core kernel
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:45:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1112622313.7189.50.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050402031206.GB23284@chandralinux.beaverton.ibm.com>
> static inline void
> add_page_to_active_list(struct zone *zone, struct page *page)
> {
> list_add(&page->lru, &zone->active_list);
> zone->nr_active++;
> + ckrm_mem_inc_active(page);
> }
Are any of the current zone statistics used any more when this is
compiled in?
Also, why does everything have to say ckrm_* on it? What if somebody
else comes along and wants to use the same functions to do some other
kind of accounting?
I think names like this are plenty long and descriptive enough:
mem_inc_active(page);
clear_page_class(page);
set_page_class(...);
I'd drop the "ckrm_".
> +#define PG_ckrm_account 21 /* CKRM accounting */
Are you sure you really need this bit *and* a whole new pointer in
'struct page'? We already do some tricks with ->mapping so that we can
tell what is stored in it. You could easily do something with the low
bit of your new structure member.
> @@ -355,6 +356,7 @@ free_pages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int c
> /* have to delete it as __free_pages_bulk list manipulates */
> list_del(&page->lru);
> __free_pages_bulk(page, zone, order);
> + ckrm_clear_page_class(page);
> ret++;
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
When your option is on, how costly is the addition of code, here? How
much does it hurt the microbenchmarks? How much larger does it
make .text?
> + if (!in_interrupt() && !ckrm_class_limit_ok(ckrm_get_mem_class(p)))
> + return NULL;
ckrm_class_limit_ok() is called later on in the same hot path, and
there's a for loop in there over each zone. How expensive is this on
SGI's machines? What about an 8-node x44[05]? Why can't you call it
from interrupts?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-04 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-02 3:12 Chandra Seetharaman
2005-04-04 13:45 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-04-05 17:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2005-04-05 17:54 ` Dave Hansen
2005-04-05 18:22 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2005-04-05 18:57 ` Dave Hansen
2005-04-05 19:38 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2005-05-19 0:31 Chandra Seetharaman
2005-06-24 22:21 Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1112622313.7189.50.camel@localhost \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox