linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] CKRM: Basic changes to the core kernel
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:45:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1112622313.7189.50.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050402031206.GB23284@chandralinux.beaverton.ibm.com>

>  static inline void
>  add_page_to_active_list(struct zone *zone, struct page *page)
>  {
>         list_add(&page->lru, &zone->active_list);
>         zone->nr_active++;
> +       ckrm_mem_inc_active(page);
>  }

Are any of the current zone statistics used any more when this is
compiled in?

Also, why does everything have to say ckrm_* on it?  What if somebody
else comes along and wants to use the same functions to do some other
kind of accounting? 

I think names like this are plenty long and descriptive enough:

        mem_inc_active(page);
        clear_page_class(page);
        set_page_class(...);
        
I'd drop the "ckrm_".
        
> +#define PG_ckrm_account                21      /* CKRM accounting */

Are you sure you really need this bit *and* a whole new pointer in
'struct page'?  We already do some tricks with ->mapping so that we can
tell what is stored in it.  You could easily do something with the low
bit of your new structure member.

> @@ -355,6 +356,7 @@ free_pages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int c
>                 /* have to delete it as __free_pages_bulk list manipulates */
>                 list_del(&page->lru);
>                 __free_pages_bulk(page, zone, order);
> +               ckrm_clear_page_class(page);
>                 ret++;
>         }
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);

When your option is on, how costly is the addition of code, here?  How
much does it hurt the microbenchmarks?  How much larger does it
make .text?

> +       if (!in_interrupt() && !ckrm_class_limit_ok(ckrm_get_mem_class(p)))
> +               return NULL;

ckrm_class_limit_ok() is called later on in the same hot path, and
there's a for loop in there over each zone.  How expensive is this on
SGI's machines?  What about an 8-node x44[05]?  Why can't you call it
from interrupts?

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-04 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-02  3:12 Chandra Seetharaman
2005-04-04 13:45 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-04-05 17:25   ` Chandra Seetharaman
2005-04-05 17:54     ` Dave Hansen
2005-04-05 18:22       ` Chandra Seetharaman
2005-04-05 18:57         ` Dave Hansen
2005-04-05 19:38           ` Chandra Seetharaman
2005-05-19  0:31 Chandra Seetharaman
2005-06-24 22:21 Chandra Seetharaman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1112622313.7189.50.camel@localhost \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox