From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2INGaLN003132 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:16:36 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j2INGaXZ093778 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:16:36 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2INGabG015498 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:16:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20050318150826.4ca3ad14.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20050318150826.4ca3ad14.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:16:17 -0800 Message-Id: <1111187778.9648.49.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andy Whitcroft List-ID: On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Dave Hansen wrote: > > > > There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what > > is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA() > > macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM. > > > > This patch is required if the previous patch is applied. > > This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64: > > include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined > include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > > I'll hack around it for now. I'll make sure to have it fixed properly in my copy. Could I have a copy of your .config? I'm keeping a growing collection. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org