* [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG
@ 2005-03-17 0:28 Dave Hansen
2005-03-18 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2005-03-17 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arch; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Dave Hansen, apw
There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what
is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA()
macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM.
This patch is required if the previous patch is applied.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
---
memhotplug-dave/arch/i386/mm/init.c | 12 ++++++------
memhotplug-dave/include/asm-i386/mmzone.h | 4 ++--
memhotplug-dave/include/linux/mmzone.h | 8 ++++++--
memhotplug-dave/mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 0
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/i386/Kconfig~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa arch/i386/Kconfig
diff -puN include/asm-i386/mmzone.h~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa include/asm-i386/mmzone.h
--- memhotplug/include/asm-i386/mmzone.h~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa 2005-03-16 15:46:40.000000000 -0800
+++ memhotplug-dave/include/asm-i386/mmzone.h 2005-03-16 15:46:40.000000000 -0800
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
#include <asm/smp.h>
-#if defined(CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM) || defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM)
+#if CONFIG_NUMA
extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
#define NODE_DATA(nid) (node_data[nid])
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static inline void get_memcfg_numa(void)
get_memcfg_numa_flat();
}
-#endif /* !CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM || !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
#ifdef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
diff -puN include/linux/bootmem.h~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa include/linux/bootmem.h
diff -puN include/linux/mmzone.h~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa include/linux/mmzone.h
--- memhotplug/include/linux/mmzone.h~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa 2005-03-16 15:46:40.000000000 -0800
+++ memhotplug-dave/include/linux/mmzone.h 2005-03-16 15:46:40.000000000 -0800
@@ -383,10 +383,13 @@ int lowmem_reserve_ratio_sysctl_handler(
/* Returns the number of the current Node. */
#define numa_node_id() (cpu_to_node(_smp_processor_id()))
+#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
+#define NODE_DATA(nid) (&contig_page_data)
+extern struct pglist_data contig_page_data;
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
-extern struct pglist_data contig_page_data;
-#define NODE_DATA(nid) (&contig_page_data)
#define NODE_MEM_MAP(nid) mem_map
#define MAX_NODES_SHIFT 1
#define pfn_to_nid(pfn) (0)
@@ -521,6 +524,7 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned lon
#define pfn_to_nid early_pfn_to_nid
#else
#define pfn_to_nid(pfn) 0
+#define early_pfn_to_nid(pfn) 0
#endif
#define pfn_to_pgdat(pfn) \
diff -puN mm/page_alloc.c~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa mm/page_alloc.c
--- memhotplug/mm/page_alloc.c~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa 2005-03-16 15:46:40.000000000 -0800
+++ memhotplug-dave/mm/page_alloc.c 2005-03-16 15:46:40.000000000 -0800
@@ -1784,7 +1784,7 @@ void __init free_area_init_node(int nid,
free_area_init_core(pgdat, zones_size, zholes_size);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
+#ifndef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
static bootmem_data_t contig_bootmem_data;
struct pglist_data contig_page_data = { .bdata = &contig_bootmem_data };
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/setup.c~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
diff -puN arch/i386/mm/init.c~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa arch/i386/mm/init.c
--- memhotplug/arch/i386/mm/init.c~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa 2005-03-16 15:46:40.000000000 -0800
+++ memhotplug-dave/arch/i386/mm/init.c 2005-03-16 15:46:40.000000000 -0800
@@ -277,7 +277,9 @@ void __init one_highpage_init(struct pag
SetPageReserved(page);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+extern void set_highmem_pages_init(int);
+#else
static void __init set_highmem_pages_init(int bad_ppro)
{
int pfn;
@@ -285,8 +287,6 @@ static void __init set_highmem_pages_ini
one_highpage_init(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, bad_ppro);
totalram_pages += totalhigh_pages;
}
-#else
-extern void set_highmem_pages_init(int);
#endif /* CONFIG_FLATMEM */
#else
@@ -298,10 +298,10 @@ extern void set_highmem_pages_init(int);
unsigned long long __PAGE_KERNEL = _PAGE_KERNEL;
unsigned long long __PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC = _PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
-#define remap_numa_kva() do {} while (0)
-#else
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern void __init remap_numa_kva(void);
+#else
+#define remap_numa_kva() do {} while (0)
#endif
static void __init pagetable_init (void)
diff -puN mm/memory.c~B-sparse-161-i386-separate-flatmem-and-numa mm/memory.c
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG
2005-03-17 0:28 [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG Dave Hansen
@ 2005-03-18 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 23:16 ` Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2005-03-18 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Hansen; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, apw
Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what
> is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA()
> macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM.
>
> This patch is required if the previous patch is applied.
This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64:
include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined
include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
I'll hack around it for now.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG
2005-03-18 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2005-03-18 23:16 ` Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2005-03-18 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-mm, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andy Whitcroft
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what
> > is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA()
> > macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM.
> >
> > This patch is required if the previous patch is applied.
>
> This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64:
>
> include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined
> include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
>
> I'll hack around it for now.
I'll make sure to have it fixed properly in my copy.
Could I have a copy of your .config? I'm keeping a growing collection.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-18 23:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-17 0:28 [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG Dave Hansen
2005-03-18 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 23:16 ` Dave Hansen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox