linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: mel@csn.ul.ie, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 0/2 Buddy allocator with placement policy (Version 9) + prezeroing (Version 4)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:17:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110485835.24355.1.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050310121124.488cb7c5.pj@engr.sgi.com>

On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 12:11 -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Dave wrote:
> > Perhaps default policies inherited from a cpuset, but overridden by
> > other APIs would be a good compromise.
> 
> Perhaps.  The madvise() and numa calls (mbind, set_mempolicy) only
> affect the current task, as is usually appropriate for calls that allow
> specification of specific address ranges (strangers shouldn't be messing
> in my address space).  Some external means to set default policy for
> whole tasks seems to be needed, as well, which could well be via the
> cpuset.

Shouldn't a particular task know what the policy should be when it is
launched?  If the policy is only per-task and known at task exec time,
I'd imagine that a simple exec wrapper setting a flag would be much more
effective than even defining the policy in a cpuset.  

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-10 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-07 19:39 Mel Gorman
2005-03-07 23:59 ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-10 14:31   ` Mel Gorman
2005-03-10 17:22     ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 18:16       ` Dave Hansen
2005-03-10 20:11         ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 20:17           ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-03-10 20:54             ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-14 14:10         ` Mel Gorman
2005-03-14 19:10           ` Paul Jackson
2005-03-10 17:37     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1110485835.24355.1.camel@localhost \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=pj@engr.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox