From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: RFC: Speed freeing memory for suspend. From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: ncunningham@cyclades.com In-Reply-To: <1110201773.422c55ad65110@webmail.topalis> References: <1109812166.3733.3.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au> <1110201773.422c55ad65110@webmail.topalis> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1110232951.25139.8.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 09:02:31 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Stefan Voelkel Cc: Linux Memory Management List-ID: Hi. They're actually quite different, so far as I can see. My patch simply increases the number of pages that the VM scans in one go. It doesn't use allocation to create additional VM pressure. Regards, Nigel On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 00:22, Stefan Voelkel wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to do something similar, if not in code but effekt, for apm -s, but > it did not work and my mail was unanswered: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=110779400803717&w=2 > > regards > Stefan -- Nigel Cunningham Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia http://www.cyclades.com Bus: +61 (2) 6291 9554; Hme: +61 (2) 6292 8028; Mob: +61 (417) 100 574 Maintainer of Suspend2 Kernel Patches http://softwaresuspend.berlios.de -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org