linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: jamesclv@us.ibm.com
Cc: keith <kmannth@us.ibm.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	matt dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] SRAT cleanup: make calculations and indenting level more sane
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:24:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109355851.6921.1.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200502241456.14048.jamesclv@us.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

Keith, James,

How about this one?  I think it handles non-sequential entries, and it
uses node_has_online_mem() instead of open-coding it.  

-- Dave

[-- Attachment #2: A3.3-srat-cleanup.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3685 bytes --]


Using the assumption that all addresses in the SRAT are ascending,
the calculations can get a bit simpler, and remove the 
"been_here_before" variable.

This also breaks that calculation out into its own function, which
further simplifies the look of the code.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
---

 sparse-dave/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c |   67 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/srat.c~A3.3-srat-cleanup arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
--- sparse/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c~A3.3-srat-cleanup	2005-02-25 10:18:19.000000000 -0800
+++ sparse-dave/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c	2005-02-25 10:18:26.000000000 -0800
@@ -181,6 +181,38 @@ static __init void chunk_to_zones(unsign
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * The SRAT table always lists ascending addresses, so can always
+ * assume that the first "start" address that you see is the real
+ * start of the node, and that the current "end" address is after
+ * the previous one.
+ */
+static __init void node_read_chunk(int nid, struct node_memory_chunk_s *memory_chunk)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Only add present memory as told by the e820.
+	 * There is no guarantee from the SRAT that the memory it
+	 * enumerates is present at boot time because it represents
+	 * *possible* memory hotplug areas the same as normal RAM.
+	 */
+	if (memory_chunk->start_pfn >= max_pfn) {
+		printk (KERN_INFO "Ignoring SRAT pfns: 0x%08lx -> %08lx\n",
+			memory_chunk->start_pfn, memory_chunk->end_pfn);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (memory_chunk->nid != nid)
+		return;
+
+	if (!node_has_online_mem(nid))
+		node_start_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->start_pfn;
+
+	if (node_start_pfn[nid] > memory_chunk->start_pfn)
+		node_start_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->start_pfn;
+
+	if (node_end_pfn[nid] < memory_chunk->end_pfn)
+		node_end_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->end_pfn;
+}
+
 /* Parse the ACPI Static Resource Affinity Table */
 static int __init acpi20_parse_srat(struct acpi_table_srat *sratp)
 {
@@ -261,41 +293,12 @@ static int __init acpi20_parse_srat(stru
 	printk("Number of memory chunks in system = %d\n", num_memory_chunks);
 
 	for (j = 0; j < num_memory_chunks; j++){
+		struct node_memory_chunk_s * chunk = &node_memory_chunk[j];
 		printk("chunk %d nid %d start_pfn %08lx end_pfn %08lx\n",
-		       j, node_memory_chunk[j].nid,
-		       node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn,
-		       node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn);
+		       j, chunk->nid, chunk->start_pfn, chunk->end_pfn);
+		node_read_chunk(chunk->nid, chunk);
 	}
  
-	/*calculate node_start_pfn/node_end_pfn arrays*/
-	for_each_online_node(nid) {
-		int been_here_before = 0;
-
-		for (j = 0; j < num_memory_chunks; j++){
-			/*
-			 * Only add present memroy to node_end/start_pfn
-			 * There is no guarantee from the srat that the memory
-			 * is present at boot time.
-			 */
-			if (node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn >= max_pfn) {
-				printk (KERN_INFO "Ignoring chunk of memory reported in the SRAT (could be hot-add zone?)\n");
-				printk (KERN_INFO "chunk is reported from pfn %04x to %04x\n",
-					node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn, node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn);
-				continue;
-			}
-			if (node_memory_chunk[j].nid == nid) {
-				if (been_here_before == 0) {
-					node_start_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn;
-					node_end_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn;
-					been_here_before = 1;
-				} else { /* We've found another chunk of memory for the node */
-					if (node_start_pfn[nid] < node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn) {
-						node_end_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn;
-					}
-				}
-			}
-		}
-	}
 	for_each_online_node(nid) {
 		unsigned long start = node_start_pfn[nid];
 		unsigned long end = node_end_pfn[nid];
_

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-25 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-24 17:29 Dave Hansen
2005-02-24 19:30 ` keith
2005-02-24 19:54   ` Dave Hansen
2005-02-24 20:49     ` James Cleverdon
2005-02-24 22:02       ` keith
2005-02-24 22:56         ` James Cleverdon
2005-02-25 18:24           ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-02-28 18:54 Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1109355851.6921.1.camel@localhost \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=apw@shadowen.org \
    --cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox