From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: jamesclv@us.ibm.com
Cc: keith <kmannth@us.ibm.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
matt dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] SRAT cleanup: make calculations and indenting level more sane
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:24:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109355851.6921.1.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200502241456.14048.jamesclv@us.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]
Keith, James,
How about this one? I think it handles non-sequential entries, and it
uses node_has_online_mem() instead of open-coding it.
-- Dave
[-- Attachment #2: A3.3-srat-cleanup.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3685 bytes --]
Using the assumption that all addresses in the SRAT are ascending,
the calculations can get a bit simpler, and remove the
"been_here_before" variable.
This also breaks that calculation out into its own function, which
further simplifies the look of the code.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
---
sparse-dave/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/srat.c~A3.3-srat-cleanup arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
--- sparse/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c~A3.3-srat-cleanup 2005-02-25 10:18:19.000000000 -0800
+++ sparse-dave/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c 2005-02-25 10:18:26.000000000 -0800
@@ -181,6 +181,38 @@ static __init void chunk_to_zones(unsign
}
}
+/*
+ * The SRAT table always lists ascending addresses, so can always
+ * assume that the first "start" address that you see is the real
+ * start of the node, and that the current "end" address is after
+ * the previous one.
+ */
+static __init void node_read_chunk(int nid, struct node_memory_chunk_s *memory_chunk)
+{
+ /*
+ * Only add present memory as told by the e820.
+ * There is no guarantee from the SRAT that the memory it
+ * enumerates is present at boot time because it represents
+ * *possible* memory hotplug areas the same as normal RAM.
+ */
+ if (memory_chunk->start_pfn >= max_pfn) {
+ printk (KERN_INFO "Ignoring SRAT pfns: 0x%08lx -> %08lx\n",
+ memory_chunk->start_pfn, memory_chunk->end_pfn);
+ return;
+ }
+ if (memory_chunk->nid != nid)
+ return;
+
+ if (!node_has_online_mem(nid))
+ node_start_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->start_pfn;
+
+ if (node_start_pfn[nid] > memory_chunk->start_pfn)
+ node_start_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->start_pfn;
+
+ if (node_end_pfn[nid] < memory_chunk->end_pfn)
+ node_end_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->end_pfn;
+}
+
/* Parse the ACPI Static Resource Affinity Table */
static int __init acpi20_parse_srat(struct acpi_table_srat *sratp)
{
@@ -261,41 +293,12 @@ static int __init acpi20_parse_srat(stru
printk("Number of memory chunks in system = %d\n", num_memory_chunks);
for (j = 0; j < num_memory_chunks; j++){
+ struct node_memory_chunk_s * chunk = &node_memory_chunk[j];
printk("chunk %d nid %d start_pfn %08lx end_pfn %08lx\n",
- j, node_memory_chunk[j].nid,
- node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn,
- node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn);
+ j, chunk->nid, chunk->start_pfn, chunk->end_pfn);
+ node_read_chunk(chunk->nid, chunk);
}
- /*calculate node_start_pfn/node_end_pfn arrays*/
- for_each_online_node(nid) {
- int been_here_before = 0;
-
- for (j = 0; j < num_memory_chunks; j++){
- /*
- * Only add present memroy to node_end/start_pfn
- * There is no guarantee from the srat that the memory
- * is present at boot time.
- */
- if (node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn >= max_pfn) {
- printk (KERN_INFO "Ignoring chunk of memory reported in the SRAT (could be hot-add zone?)\n");
- printk (KERN_INFO "chunk is reported from pfn %04x to %04x\n",
- node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn, node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn);
- continue;
- }
- if (node_memory_chunk[j].nid == nid) {
- if (been_here_before == 0) {
- node_start_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn;
- node_end_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn;
- been_here_before = 1;
- } else { /* We've found another chunk of memory for the node */
- if (node_start_pfn[nid] < node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn) {
- node_end_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn;
- }
- }
- }
- }
- }
for_each_online_node(nid) {
unsigned long start = node_start_pfn[nid];
unsigned long end = node_end_pfn[nid];
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-25 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-24 17:29 Dave Hansen
2005-02-24 19:30 ` keith
2005-02-24 19:54 ` Dave Hansen
2005-02-24 20:49 ` James Cleverdon
2005-02-24 22:02 ` keith
2005-02-24 22:56 ` James Cleverdon
2005-02-25 18:24 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2005-02-28 18:54 Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109355851.6921.1.camel@localhost \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox