From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.193.32]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iABJaxAD317142 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:36:59 -0500 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by westrelay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id iABJb2b4147530 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:37:02 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iABJaxLQ026496 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:36:59 -0700 Subject: Re: [Fwd: Page allocator doubt] From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <4193BD07.5010100@tteng.com.br> References: <41937940.9070001@tteng.com.br> <1100200247.932.1145.camel@localhost> <4193BD07.5010100@tteng.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1100201816.7883.22.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:36:56 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Luciano A. Stertz" Cc: linux-mm List-ID: On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 11:27, Luciano A. Stertz wrote: > But... are they allocated to me, even with page_count zeroed? Do I need > to do get_page on the them? Sorry if it's a too lame question, but I > still didn't understand and found no place to read about this. Do you see anywhere in the page allocator where it does a loop like yours? for (i = 1; i< 1< aart@kvack.org