From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org
Cc: lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, riel@surriel.com,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, jannh@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
baohua@kernel.org, dev.jain@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] arm64: mm: implement the architecture-specific clear_flush_young_ptes()
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 16:30:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10f061c9-5c9a-4e8a-8790-a2a68b38ff33@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce749fbae3e900e733fa104a16fcb3ca9fe4f9bd.1770645603.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
On 2/9/26 15:07, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Implement the Arm64 architecture-specific clear_flush_young_ptes() to enable
> batched checking of young flags and TLB flushing, improving performance during
> large folio reclamation.
>
> Performance testing:
> Allocate 10G clean file-backed folios by mmap() in a memory cgroup, and try to
> reclaim 8G file-backed folios via the memory.reclaim interface. I can observe
> 33% performance improvement on my Arm64 32-core server (and 10%+ improvement
> on my X86 machine). Meanwhile, the hotspot folio_check_references() dropped
> from approximately 35% to around 5%.
>
> W/o patchset:
> real 0m1.518s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m1.518s
>
> W/ patchset:
> real 0m1.018s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m1.018s
>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 3dabf5ea17fa..a17eb8a76788 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -1838,6 +1838,17 @@ static inline int ptep_clear_flush_young(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> return contpte_clear_flush_young_ptes(vma, addr, ptep, 1);
> }
>
> +#define clear_flush_young_ptes clear_flush_young_ptes
> +static inline int clear_flush_young_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> + unsigned int nr)
> +{
> + if (likely(nr == 1 && !pte_cont(__ptep_get(ptep))))
I guess similar cases where we should never end up with non-present ptes
should be updated accordingly.
ptep_test_and_clear_young(), for example, should never be called on
non-present ptes.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-09 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-09 14:07 [PATCH v6 0/5] support batch checking of references and unmapping for large folios Baolin Wang
2026-02-09 14:07 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] mm: rmap: support batched checks of the references " Baolin Wang
2026-02-09 15:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-09 14:07 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] arm64: mm: factor out the address and ptep alignment into a new helper Baolin Wang
2026-02-09 14:07 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] arm64: mm: support batch clearing of the young flag for large folios Baolin Wang
2026-02-09 14:07 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] arm64: mm: implement the architecture-specific clear_flush_young_ptes() Baolin Wang
2026-02-09 15:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-02-10 0:39 ` Baolin Wang
2026-02-09 14:07 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] mm: rmap: support batched unmapping for file large folios Baolin Wang
2026-02-09 15:31 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-02-10 1:53 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] support batch checking of references and unmapping for " Andrew Morton
2026-02-10 2:01 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10f061c9-5c9a-4e8a-8790-a2a68b38ff33@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox