From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
lhms <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: [Lhms-devel] [RFC] buddy allocator without bitmap [2/4]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:31:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1093584691.2984.473.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412EC71B.4070308@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 22:31, Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA wrote:
> I cannot find suitable one, so I test in microbenchmark calling mmap()
> and munmap(). As you say, real-world workload test is more suitable to
> measure kernel's performance.
Sorry, I thought you were just running a loop with atomic operations
inside of it, not actually exercising the kernel itself. The test you
described in your mail to Andrew sounds much more useful than what I
thought it was.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-27 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-26 12:03 Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-26 15:50 ` [Lhms-devel] " Dave Hansen
2004-08-26 23:05 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-26 23:11 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-26 23:28 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-27 0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-27 0:27 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-27 4:48 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-27 4:59 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-27 5:20 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-27 5:04 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-27 5:31 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-27 5:31 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2004-08-27 5:47 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-27 6:09 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1093584691.2984.473.camel@nighthawk \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox