From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [Lhms-devel] new memory hotremoval patch From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20040701055836.A688F70A92@sv1.valinux.co.jp> References: <20040630111719.EBACF70A92@sv1.valinux.co.jp> <1088640671.5265.1017.camel@nighthawk> <20040701030543.8CE8F70A92@sv1.valinux.co.jp> <1088659723.10720.3.camel@nighthawk> <20040701055836.A688F70A92@sv1.valinux.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1088662503.10720.6.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:15:03 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: IWAMOTO Toshihiro Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , lhms , linux-mm List-ID: On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 22:58, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote: > Such code only appears only in try_to_unuse and do_swap_page. These > functions aren't for page caches. > > I'm confused. Weren't you talking about page cache code? Ahh. Gotcha. MI saw some of the BUG_ON()s and some of the swap code and misinterpreted where the flag was being used. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org