From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"BRADLEY CHRISTIANSEN [imap]" <bradc1@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fix page->count discrepancy for zero page
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:05:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1088460353.5471.406.camel@nighthawk> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 992 bytes --]
While writing some analysis tools for memory hot-remove, we came across
a single page which had a ->count that always increased, without bound.
It ended up always being the zero page, and it was caused by a leaked
reference in some do_wp_page() code that ends up avoiding PG_reserved
pages.
Basically what happens is that page_cache_release()/put_page() ignore
PG_reserved pages, while page_cache_get()/get_page() go ahead and take
the reference. So, each time there's a COW fault on the zero-page, you
get a leaked page->count increment.
It's pretty rare to have a COW fault on anything that's PG_reserved, in
fact, I can't think of anything else that this applies to other than the
zero page.
In any case, it the bug doesn't cause any real problems, but it is a bit
of an annoyance and is obviously incorrect. We've been running with
this patch for about 3 months now, and haven't run into any problems
with it.
Attached patch is against 2.6.7 and applies to -mm3 properly.
-- Dave
[-- Attachment #2: patch-2.6.7-zpage --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 453 bytes --]
diff -urp linux-2.6.7/mm/memory.c linux-2.6.7-zpage/mm/memory.c
--- linux-2.6.7/mm/memory.c Tue Jun 15 22:19:22 2004
+++ linux-2.6.7-zpage/mm/memory.c Thu Jun 24 12:08:42 2004
@@ -1064,7 +1064,8 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct *
/*
* Ok, we need to copy. Oh, well..
*/
- page_cache_get(old_page);
+ if (!PageReserved(old_page))
+ page_cache_get(old_page);
spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma)))
reply other threads:[~2004-06-28 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1088460353.5471.406.camel@nighthawk \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bradc1@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox