From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Architectures Group <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Fix possible race with set_pte on a present PTE
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 08:00:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085695254.7835.126.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16566.25617.363386.115466@napali.hpl.hp.com>
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 07:56, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 25 May 2004 06:53:22 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> said:
>
> >> If the "accessed" or "dirty" bits are zero, accessing/writing the
> >> page will cause a fault which will be handled in a low-level
> >> fault handler. The Linux version of these handlers simply turn
> >> on the respective bit. See daccess_bit(), iaccess_bit(), and dirty_bit()
> >> in arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S.
>
> Andrea> so you mean, this is being set in the arch section before
> Andrea> ever reaching handle_mm_fault?
>
> Correct. The low-level fault handlers set the ACCESSED/DIRTY bits
> with an atomic compare-and-exchange (on SMP). They don't (normally)
> bubble up all the way to the Linux page-fault handler.
Same for PPC, but we still have a race where we can reach that code, see
my initial mail (typically, because your low level code, for obvious
reasons, doesn't take the mm semaphore, thus the page may have been
mapped right after you decide to go to do_page_fault and before it takes
the mm sem).
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-27 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1085369393.15315.28.camel@gaston>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405232046210.25502@ppc970.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1085371988.15281.38.camel@gaston>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405232134480.25502@ppc970.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1085373839.14969.42.camel@gaston>
2004-05-24 5:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-24 5:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-24 5:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-24 5:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-24 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-24 5:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 3:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 4:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 4:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 4:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 4:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 4:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 5:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 4:43 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-25 4:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-27 21:56 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-27 22:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-05-27 22:12 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-25 11:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-05-25 14:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 15:35 ` Keith M Wesolowski
2004-05-25 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 17:25 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-25 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 17:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-25 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 20:35 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-25 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 20:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-26 6:20 ` Keith M Wesolowski
2004-05-25 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 21:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 0:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 3:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 4:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 4:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 4:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 4:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 5:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 5:59 ` [PATCH] (signoff) " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 6:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 22:05 ` [PATCH] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 22:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 21:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 21:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 22:18 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2004-05-25 22:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-26 2:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 7:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 21:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-01 12:04 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-06-01 12:10 Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1085695254.7835.126.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox