From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Fix possible race with set_pte on a present PTE
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:34:49 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085376888.24948.45.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405232149380.25502@ppc970.osdl.org>
> Ahh.. That's a bug, methinks.
>
> The reason it's a bug is that if you do this, you can lose the dirty bit
> being written on some other CPU asynchronously.
Hrm... right indeed.
> In other words, I think it's pretty much always a bug to do a "set_pte()"
> with an existing pte in place, exactly because you lose information. You
> are trying to cover up the bug in ppc64-specific code, but I think that
> what you found is actually a (really really) unlikely race condition that
> can have serious consequences.
>
> Or am I missing something else?
Well, the original scenario triggering that from userland is, imho, so
broken, that we may just not care losing that dirty bit ... Oh well :)
Anyway, apply my patch. If pte is not present, this will have no effect,
if it is, it makes sure we never leave a stale HPTE in the hash, which
is fatal in far worse ways.
> [ grep grep grep ]
>
> Looks like "break_cow()" and "do_wp_page()" are safe, but only because
> they always sets the dirty bit, and any other bits end up being pretty
> much "don't care if we miss an accessed bit update" or something.
>
> Hmm. Maybe I'm wrong. If this really is buggy, it's been buggy this way
> basically forever. That code is _not_ new, it's some of the oldes code in
> the whole VM since the original three-level code rewrite. I think. Of
> course, back then SMP wasn't an issue, and this seems to have survived all
> the SMP fixes.
>
> Who else has been working on the page tables that could verify this for
> me? Ingo? Ben LaHaise? I forget who even worked on this, because it's so
> long ago we went through all the atomicity issues with the page table
> updates on SMP. There may be some reason that I'm overlooking that
> explains why I'm full of sh*t.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-24 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1085369393.15315.28.camel@gaston>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405232046210.25502@ppc970.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1085371988.15281.38.camel@gaston>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405232134480.25502@ppc970.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1085373839.14969.42.camel@gaston>
2004-05-24 5:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-24 5:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-05-24 5:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-24 5:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-24 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-05-24 5:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 3:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 4:17 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 4:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 4:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 4:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 4:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 5:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 4:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 4:43 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-25 4:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-27 21:56 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-27 22:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-27 22:12 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-25 11:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-05-25 14:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 15:35 ` Keith M Wesolowski
2004-05-25 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 17:25 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-25 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 17:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-25 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 20:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 20:35 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-25 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 20:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-26 6:20 ` Keith M Wesolowski
2004-05-25 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 21:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 0:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 3:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 4:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 4:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 4:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 4:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 4:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 5:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 5:59 ` [PATCH] (signoff) " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-26 6:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 22:05 ` [PATCH] " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 22:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-25 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 21:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 21:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-25 22:18 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2004-05-25 22:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-26 2:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-26 7:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-25 21:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-06-01 12:04 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-06-01 12:10 Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1085376888.24948.45.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox