From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?
Date: 01 Apr 2004 17:33:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080837208.2626.111.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404010750100.1116@ppc970.osdl.org>
Hi,
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 17:02, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Worse, it doesn't seem to be implemented consistently either. I've been
> > trying on a few other Unixen while writing this. First on a Tru64 box,
> > and it is _not_ kicking off any IO at all for MS_ASYNC, except for the
> > 30-second regular sync. The same appears to be true on FreeBSD. And on
> > HP-UX, things go in the other direction: the performance of MS_ASYNC is
> > identical to MS_SYNC, both in terms of observed disk IO during the sync
> > and the overall rate of the msync loop.
>
> If you check HP-UX, make sure it's a recent one. HPUX has historically
> been just too broken for words when it comes to mmap() (ie some _really_
> strange semantics, like not being able to unmap partial mappings etc).
I'm not sure what counts as "recent" for that, but this was on HP-UX
11. That's the most recent I've got access to.
--Stephen
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-01 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-31 22:16 Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-03-31 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-03-31 23:41 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-04-01 0:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-01 0:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 15:40 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-04-01 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-01 16:33 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2004-04-01 16:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-01 16:56 ` s390 storage key inconsistency? [was Re: msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch?] Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-04-01 16:57 ` msync() behaviour broken for MS_ASYNC, revert patch? Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-04-01 18:51 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-31 22:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-31 23:20 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-04-16 22:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-19 21:54 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-04-21 2:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-21 9:52 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1080837208.2626.111.camel@sisko.scot.redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox