From: Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie@osdl.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.4-mm2
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:21:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080069704.10668.122.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040322162729.2f2ddbe4.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 16:27, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie@osdl.org> wrote:
> >
> > [was "Poor DBT-3 pgsql 8way numbers on recent 2.6 mm kernels" on
> > linux-mm]
> >
> > Andrew,
> >
> > This same patch (02) applied in STP (plm 2780) when run against
> > dbt3-pgsql DSS workload displays the performance problem with the
> > throughput numbers that I reported on linux-mm on our 8way systems,
> > where the previous patch (plm 2777 -01) does not.
> >
> > Here is the data (patches applied to 2.6.5-rc1)
> >
> > PLM.....CPUs.Runid..Thruput Metric (bigger is better)
> > 2777(01) 8 290298 138.22 (base )
> > 2779(02) 8 290304 88.57 (-35.9%)
>
> 36% regression due to the CPU scheduler changes? ow.
>
> And that machine is a PIII, so presumably the setting of CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> makes no difference.
>
> >From a quick look at the material you have there it appears that this
> workload also is very I/O bound. It's a little surprising that the CPU
> scheduler could make so much difference.
I'm not sure why you think this is IO bound. For
the throughput phase of the test (from which the
metric above is taken) there is very little physical
IO except at the start when the updates occur. They
finish in a few minutes, after which there is very
little.
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/290304/results/plot/thuput.vmstat_io.png
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/290304/results/plot/thuput.vmstat.txt
Perhaps you were looking at the start or at some other
part of the test?
The power test (single stream phase) does not display
any performance hit at all compared to the baseline.
The throughput test runs eight streams (processes)
and does display the problem. Furthermore the problem
is worse on 8 ways than on 4 ways. It seems reasonable
to me that this could be due to a task schedule issue.
Am I missing something?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Mary Edie Meredith
maryedie@osdl.org
503-626-2455 x42
Open Source Development Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-23 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040314172809.31bd72f7.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <200403181737.i2IHbCE09261@mail.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20040318100615.7f2943ea.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20040318192707.GV22234@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20040318191530.34e04cb2.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20040318194150.4de65049.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20040319183906.I8594@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net>
2004-03-22 17:19 ` 2.6.4-mm2 Mary Edie Meredith
2004-03-23 0:27 ` 2.6.4-mm2 Andrew Morton
2004-03-23 19:21 ` Mary Edie Meredith [this message]
2004-03-23 19:32 ` 2.6.4-mm2 Andrew Morton
2004-03-24 0:07 ` 2.6.4-mm2 Mary Edie Meredith
2004-03-30 21:30 ` 2.6.4-mm2 Mary Edie Meredith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1080069704.10668.122.camel@localhost \
--to=maryedie@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox