From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: maryedie@osdl.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Poor DBT-3 pgsql 8way numbers on recent 2.6 mm kernels
Date: 15 Mar 2004 11:33:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079379197.2844.32.camel@dyn319094bld.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1079369109.2961.181.camel@localhost>
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 08:45, Mary Edie Meredith wrote:
>
>
> > And if that is indeed the case I'd be suspecting the CPU scheduler. But
> > then, Meredith's profiles show almost completely idle CPUs.
> >
> > The simplest way to hunt this down is the old binary-search-through-the-patches process. But that requires some test which takes just a few minutes.
>
> If you are referring to a binary search to find when the
> performance changed, I can do this with STP. It may take
> some time, but I'm willing. I didnt want to do that if
> the problem was a known problem.
Based on your data, I dont think readahead patch is responsible. However
since you are seeing this only on mm kernel there is a small needle of
suspicion on the readahead patch.
How about reverting only the readahaed patch in mm tree and trying it
out?
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.3-rc1/2.6.3-rc1-mm1/broken-out/adaptive-lazy-readahead.patch
My DSS workload benchmarks always touches the disk because I have only
4GB memory configured. I will give a try with 8GB memory and see if I
see any of your behavior. (I wont be able to put all my database in
memory)...
RP
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-15 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-12 22:31 Mary Edie Meredith
2004-03-13 7:39 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <405379ED.A7D6B1E4@us.ibm.com>
2004-03-13 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-15 16:45 ` Mary Edie Meredith
2004-03-15 17:16 ` Badari Pulavarty
2004-03-15 19:33 ` Ram Pai [this message]
2004-03-17 19:31 ` Mary Edie Meredith
2004-03-17 20:33 ` Ram Pai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1079379197.2844.32.camel@dyn319094bld.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maryedie@osdl.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox