From: Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie@osdl.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Mary Edie Meredith <maryedie@osdl.org>
Subject: Poor DBT-3 pgsql 8way numbers on recent 2.6 mm kernels
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:31:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079130684.2961.134.camel@localhost> (raw)
For the last few mm kernels, I have discovered a
performance problem in DBT-3 (using PostgreSQL)
in the "throughput" portion of the test (when the
test is running multiple processes ) on our 8-way
STP systems as compared to 4-way runs and the baseline
kernel results.
Using the default DBT-3 options (ie using LVM, ext2,
PostgreSQL version 7.4.1) on RH9 for 2.6.4-mm1 (PLM 2745)
[Note that the 4-way number is _better than the 8-way
number]
2.6.4-mm1
Runid..CPUs.Thruput (bigger is better)
289860 8 86.5<-----------(profiling data below)
289831 4 112.7
Compare to base:
linux-2.6.4
Runid..CPUs.Thruput
289421 8 137.2<----------
289383 4 120.73
DBT-3 is a read mostly DSS workload and the throughput
phase is where we run multiple query streams (as
many as we have CPUs). In this workload, the database
is stored on a file system and it almost completely
caches in page cache early on. So there is not a lot
of physical IO in the throughput portion of the test.
I also found similar 8way thruput numbers on these
mm kernels:
Kernel........PLM..Thruput
2.6.4rc2-mm1 2676 84.56
2.6.4rc1-mm2 2666 85.54
2.6.4rc1-mm1 2664 85.73
Before the 2.6.3-mm4 kernel, the test we are running
now (with LVM and pgsql 7.4.1 was not available) so
results are not availablewithout running them manually.
I did run 2.6.1-mm5and it had a thruput result of 124.02
on an 8way. Still not great but definitely better
than ~86.0.
I just wanted to report this and I wonder if you already
know why this is happening.
--------------------------------------------------
Profiling data from RUNID 289860 sorted first by
ticks, second by load:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/289860/profile/Framework_Close-tick.sort
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/289860/profile/Framework_Close-load.sort
--
Mary Edie Meredith
maryedie@osdl.org
503-626-2455 x42
Open Source Development Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-12 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-12 22:31 Mary Edie Meredith [this message]
2004-03-13 7:39 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <405379ED.A7D6B1E4@us.ibm.com>
2004-03-13 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-15 16:45 ` Mary Edie Meredith
2004-03-15 17:16 ` Badari Pulavarty
2004-03-15 19:33 ` Ram Pai
2004-03-17 19:31 ` Mary Edie Meredith
2004-03-17 20:33 ` Ram Pai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1079130684.2961.134.camel@localhost \
--to=maryedie@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox