From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: paulmck@us.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:51:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1077108694.4479.4.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040217161929.7e6b2a61.akpm@osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 01:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > IBM shipped the promised SAN Filesystem some months ago.
>
> Neat, but it's hard to see the relevance of this to your patch.
>
> I don't see any licensing issues with the patch because the filesystem
> which needs it clearly meets Linus's "this is not a derived work" criteria.
it does?
It needed no changes to work on linux?
it only uses "core unix" apis ?
it needs no changes to the core kernel? *buzz*
It doesn't require knowledge of deep and changing internals ? *buzz*
It doesn't need changing for various kernel versions ?
I remember this baby overriding syscalls and the like not too long
ago...
The word "clearly" isn't correct imo. Just because something has a few
lines of code that started on another OS doesn't make it "clearly" not a
derived work, at least not in my eyes.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-18 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-16 19:09 Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-17 2:31 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-17 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-17 12:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-18 0:19 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 12:51 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2004-02-18 14:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-18 21:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-18 15:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-18 22:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-18 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 23:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-18 16:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-18 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 12:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-19 18:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 19:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-19 13:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 3:17 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-20 21:46 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-19 0:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 18:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-19 12:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-19 9:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-19 18:32 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-19 18:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-19 19:16 ` viro
2004-02-19 16:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-19 18:59 ` Tim Bird
2004-02-20 1:27 ` David Schwartz
2004-02-19 9:11 ` David Weinehall
2004-02-19 8:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-03-04 5:51 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-19 10:29 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-19 9:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-19 11:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-02-19 11:53 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-02-18 18:04 ` Tim Bird
2004-02-19 20:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-19 22:06 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-02-19 22:31 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-19 16:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 2:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-19 19:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 5:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-20 12:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 20:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-20 14:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 23:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-20 16:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-21 3:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-21 19:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-22 23:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-25 21:04 ` [RFC] Distributed mmap API Daniel Phillips
2004-02-25 19:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-25 19:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-25 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 22:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-25 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-25 22:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-03-03 3:00 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-03-03 3:15 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-03 13:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-03-04 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-02-20 21:17 ` Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-20 22:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-02-18 12:12 ` Dominik Kubla
2004-02-17 22:22 ` David Weinehall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1077108694.4479.4.camel@laptop.fenrus.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox