From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Rahul Karnik <rahul@genebrew.com>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>,
rusty@linux.co.intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Enabling other oom schemes
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:48:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1063342102.700.237.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F614E36.7030206@genebrew.com>
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 00:40, Rahul Karnik wrote:
> I was referring to the "strict overcommit" mode described in
> Documentation/vm/overcommit-accounting.
Right. What Chris said is true. Strict overcommit has limitations, and
hence it is not the default.
> To me, it sounded like it was
> describing modes that were alternatives to the proposed kernel panic on
> oom, and I was merely suggesting we use the same /proc/sys/vm method to
> specify oom behavior (maybe a string rather than numeric codes in case
> we have several such options in the future). Apologies if this is not
> related to what Rusty is talking about.
I don't think the two are related. You can have both, separately or
together.
Robert Love
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-12 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-12 2:19 Rusty Lynch
2003-09-12 4:18 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-09-12 4:31 ` Chris Friesen
2003-09-12 4:40 ` Rahul Karnik
2003-09-12 4:48 ` Robert Love [this message]
2003-09-12 11:18 ` Helge Hafting
2003-09-12 14:07 ` Chris Friesen
2003-09-12 14:30 ` M. Edward Borasky
2003-09-12 4:47 ` Robert Love
2003-09-13 17:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-13 20:52 ` Robert Love
2003-09-14 5:28 ` Chris Friesen
2003-09-15 0:11 ` Mike S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1063342102.700.237.camel@localhost \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rahul@genebrew.com \
--cc=rusty@linux.co.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox