linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"Schofield, Alison" <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"Shutemov, Kirill" <kirill.shutemov@intel.com>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Sakkinen, Jarkko" <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com>,
	"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC 01/12] docs/x86: Document the Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:14:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <105F7BF4D0229846AF094488D65A098935426D55@PGSMSX112.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <105F7BF4D0229846AF094488D65A098935424996@PGSMSX112.gar.corp.intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On
> Behalf Of Huang, Kai
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 1:28 PM
> To: Schofield, Alison <alison.schofield@intel.com>; dhowells@redhat.com;
> tglx@linutronix.de
> Cc: Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@intel.com>; Shutemov, Kirill
> <kirill.shutemov@intel.com>; Hansen, Dave <dave.hansen@intel.com>;
> Sakkinen, Jarkko <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com>; jmorris@namei.org;
> keyrings@vger.kernel.org; linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org;
> mingo@redhat.com; hpa@zytor.com; x86@kernel.org; linux-mm@kvack.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC 01/12] docs/x86: Document the Multi-Key Total Memory
> Encryption API
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On
> > Behalf Of Alison Schofield
> > Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 10:34 AM
> > To: dhowells@redhat.com; tglx@linutronix.de
> > Cc: Huang, Kai <kai.huang@intel.com>; Nakajima, Jun
> > <jun.nakajima@intel.com>; Shutemov, Kirill
> > <kirill.shutemov@intel.com>; Hansen, Dave <dave.hansen@intel.com>;
> > Sakkinen, Jarkko <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com>; jmorris@namei.org;
> > keyrings@vger.kernel.org; linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org;
> > mingo@redhat.com; hpa@zytor.com; x86@kernel.org; linux-mm@kvack.org
> > Subject: [RFC 01/12] docs/x86: Document the Multi-Key Total Memory
> > Encryption API
> >
> > Document the API's used for MKTME on Intel platforms.
> > MKTME: Multi-KEY Total Memory Encryption
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/x86/mktme-keys.txt | 153
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 153 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/mktme-keys.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/mktme-keys.txt
> > b/Documentation/x86/mktme- keys.txt new file mode 100644 index
> > 000000000000..2dea7acd2a17
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/x86/mktme-keys.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
> > +MKTME (Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption) is a technology that allows
> > +memory encryption on Intel platforms. Whereas TME (Total Memory
> > +Encryption) allows encryption of the entire system memory using a
> > +single key, MKTME allows multiple encryption domains, each having
> > +their own key. The main use case for the feature is virtual machine
> > +isolation. The API's introduced here are intended to offer
> > +flexibility to work in a
> > wide range of uses.
> > +
> > +The externally available Intel Architecture Spec:
> > +https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/a5/16/Multi-Ke
> > +y-
> > +Total-Memory-Encryption-Spec.pdf
> > +
> > +============================  API Overview
> > +============================
> > +
> > +There are 2 MKTME specific API's that enable userspace to create and
> > +use the memory encryption keys:
> > +
> > +1) Kernel Key Service: MKTME Type
> > +
> > +   MKTME is a new key type added to the existing Kernel Key Services
> > +   to support the memory encryption keys. The MKTME service manages
> > +   the addition and removal of MKTME keys. It maps userspace keys
> > +   to hardware keyids and programs the hardware with user requested
> > +   encryption parameters.
> > +
> > +   o An understanding of the Kernel Key Service is required in order
> > +     to use the MKTME key type as it is a subset of that service.
> > +
> > +   o MKTME keys are a limited resource. There is a single pool of
> > +     MKTME keys for a system and that pool can be from 3 to 63 keys.
> 
> Why 3 to 63 keys? Architecturally we are able to support up to 15-bit keyID,
> although in the first generation server we only support 6-bit keyID, which is 63
> key/keyIDs (excluding keyID 0, which is TME's keyID).
> 
> > +     With that in mind, userspace may take advantage of the kernel
> > +     key services sharing and permissions model for userspace keys.
> > +     One key can be shared as long as each user has the permission
> > +     of "KEY_NEED_VIEW" to use it.
> > +
> > +   o MKTME key type uses capabilities to restrict the allocation
> > +     of keys. It only requires CAP_SYS_RESOURCE, but will accept
> > +     the broader capability of CAP_SYS_ADMIN.  See capabilities(7).
> > +
> > +   o The MKTME key service blocks kernel key service commands that
> > +     could lead to reprogramming of in use keys, or loss of keys from
> > +     the pool. This means MKTME does not allow a key to be invalidated,
> > +     unlinked, or timed out. These operations are blocked by MKTME as
> > +     it creates all keys with the internal flag KEY_FLAG_KEEP.
> > +
> > +   o MKTME does not support the keyctl option of UPDATE. Userspace
> > +     may change the programming of a key by revoking it and adding
> > +     a new key with the updated encryption options (or vice-versa).
> > +
> > +2) System Call: encrypt_mprotect()
> > +
> > +   MKTME encryption is requested by calling encrypt_mprotect(). The
> > +   caller passes the serial number to a previously allocated and
> > +   programmed encryption key. That handle was created with the MKTME
> > +   Key Service.
> > +
> > +   o The caller must have KEY_NEED_VIEW permission on the key
> > +
> > +   o The range of memory that is to be protected must be mapped as
> > +     ANONYMOUS. If it is not, the entire encrypt_mprotect() request
> > +     fails with EINVAL.
> > +
> > +   o As an extension to the existing mprotect() system call,
> > +     encrypt_mprotect() supports the legacy mprotect behavior plus
> > +     the enabling of memory encryption. That means that in addition
> > +     to encrypting the memory, the protection flags will be updated
> > +     as requested in the call.
> > +
> > +   o Additional mprotect() calls to memory already protected with
> > +     MKTME will not alter the MKTME status.
> 
> I think it's better to separate encrypt_mprotect() into another doc so both parts
> can be reviewed easier.
> 
> > +
> > +======================  Usage: MKTME Key Service
> > +======================
> > +
> > +MKTME is enabled on supported Intel platforms by selecting
> > +CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MKTME which selects CONFIG_MKTME_KEYS.
> > +
> > +Allocating MKTME Keys via command line or system call:
> > +    keyctl add mktme name "[options]" ring
> > +
> > +    key_serial_t add_key(const char *type, const char *description,
> > +                         const void *payload, size_t plen,
> > +                         key_serial_t keyring);
> > +
> > +Revoking MKTME Keys via command line or system call::
> > +   keyctl revoke <key>
> > +
> > +   long keyctl(KEYCTL_REVOKE, key_serial_t key);
> > +
> > +Options Field Definition:
> > +    userkey=      ASCII HEX value encryption key. Defaults to a CPU
> > +		  generated key if a userkey is not defined here.
> > +
> > +    algorithm=    Encryption algorithm name as a string.
> > +		  Valid algorithm: "aes-xts-128"
> > +
> > +    tweak=        ASCII HEX value tweak key. Tweak key will be added to the
> > +                  userkey...  (need to be clear here that this is being sent
> > +                  to the hardware - kernel not messing w it)
> > +
> > +    entropy=      ascii hex value entropy.
> > +                  This entropy will be used to generated the CPU key and
> > +		  the tweak key when CPU generated key is requested.
> > +
> > +Algorithm Dependencies:
> > +    AES-XTS 128 is the only supported algorithm.
> > +    There are only 2 ways that AES-XTS 128 may be used:
> > +
> > +    1) User specified encryption key
> > +	- The user specified encryption key must be exactly
> > +	  16 ASCII Hex bytes (128 bits).
> > +	- A tweak key must be specified and it must be exactly
> > +	  16 ASCII Hex bytes (128 bits).
> > +	- No entropy field is accepted.
> > +
> > +    2) CPU generated encryption key
> > +	- When no user specified encryption key is provided, the
> > +	  default encryption key will be CPU generated.
> > +	- User must specify 16 ASCII Hex bytes of entropy. This
> > +	  entropy will be used by the CPU to generate both the
> > +	  encryption key and the tweak key.
> > +	- No entropy field is accepted.
> 
> This is not true. The spec says in CPU generated random mode, both 'key' and
> 'tweak' part are used to generate the final key and tweak respectively.
> 
> Actually, simple 'XOR' is used to generate the final key:
> 
> case KEYID_SET_KEY_RANDOM:
> 	......
> 	(* Mix user supplied entropy to the data key and tweak key *)
> 	TMP_RND_DATA_KEY = TMP_RND_KEY XOR
> 		TMP_KEY_PROGRAM_STRUCT.KEY_FIELD_1.BYTES[15:0];
> 	TMP_RND_TWEAK_KEY = TMP_RND_TWEAK_KEY XOR
> 		TMP_KEY_PROGRAM_STRUCT.KEY_FIELD_2.BYTES[15:0];
> 
> So I think we can either just remove 'entropy' parameter, since we can use both
> 'userkey' and 'tweak' even for random key mode.
> 
> In fact, which might be better IMHO, we can simply disallow or ignore 'userkey'
> and 'tweak' part for random key mode, since if we allow user to specify both
> entropies, and if user passes value with all 1, we are effectively making the key
> and tweak to be all 1, which is not random anymore.
> 
> Instead, kernel can generate random for both entropies, or we can simply uses 0,
> ignoring user input.

Hmm.. I just realized that I confused 'OR' and 'XOR', so the last two paragraphs doesn't make sense. :)

But still I think we can simply use "userkey" and "tweak". "entropy" is not needed IMO.

Thanks,
-Kai
> 
> Thanks,
> -Kai
> > +
> > +======================  Usage: encrypt_mprotect()
> > +======================
> > +
> > +System Call encrypt_mprotect()::
> > +
> > +    This system call is an extension of the existing mprotect() system
> > +    call. It requires the same parameters as legary mprotect() plus
> > +    one additional parameter, the keyid. Userspace must provide the
> > +    key serial number assigned through the kernel key service.
> > +
> > +    int encrypt_mprotect(void *addr, size_t len, int prot, int
> > + keyid);
> > +
> > +======================  Usage: Sample Roundtrip
> > ======================
> > +
> > +Sample usage of MKTME Key Service API with encrypt_mprotect() API:
> > +
> > +  Add a key:
> > +        key = add_key(mktme, name, options, strlen(option), keyring);
> > +
> > +  Map memory:
> > +        ptr = mmap(NULL, size, prot, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1,
> > + 0);
> > +
> > +  Protect memory:
> > +        ret = syscall(sys_encrypt_mprotect, ptr, size, prot, keyid);
> > +
> > +  Use protected memory:
> > +        ................
> > +
> > +  Free memory:
> > +        ret = munmap(ptr, size);
> > +
> > +  Revoke key:
> > +        ret = keyctl(KEYCTL_REVOKE, key);
> > +
> > --
> > 2.14.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-11  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 22:23 [RFC 00/12] Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API (MKTME) Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:34 ` [RFC 01/12] docs/x86: Document the Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API Alison Schofield
2018-09-08 18:44   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-09-10  1:28   ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11  0:13     ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11  0:33       ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11  0:45         ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11  1:14           ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-11  0:14     ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2018-09-10 17:32   ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-11  0:19     ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:34 ` [RFC 02/12] mm: Generalize the mprotect implementation to support extensions Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 10:12   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11  0:34     ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:34 ` [RFC 03/12] syscall/x86: Wire up a new system call for memory encryption keys Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:36 ` [RFC 04/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to manage " Alison Schofield
2018-09-10  2:56   ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 23:37     ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 23:41       ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 17:37   ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-07 22:36 ` [RFC 05/12] x86/mm: Add a helper function to set keyid bits in encrypted VMA's Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 17:57   ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-07 22:36 ` [RFC 06/12] mm: Add the encrypt_mprotect() system call Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 18:02   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11  2:15     ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 07/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to track encrypted VMA's Alison Schofield
2018-09-10  3:17   ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 08/12] mm: Track VMA's in use for each memory encryption keyid Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 18:20   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-11  2:39     ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-07 22:37 ` [RFC 09/12] mm: Restrict memory encryption to anonymous VMA's Alison Schofield
2018-09-10 18:21   ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-10 18:57     ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-10 21:07       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-10 21:09         ` Dave Hansen
2018-09-07 22:38 ` [RFC 10/12] x86/pconfig: Program memory encryption keys on a system-wide basis Alison Schofield
2018-09-10  1:46   ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 18:24   ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-11  2:46     ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 14:31       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2018-09-07 22:38 ` [RFC 11/12] keys/mktme: Add a new key service type for memory encryption keys Alison Schofield
2018-09-10  3:29   ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 21:47     ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-15  0:06     ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-17 10:48       ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-17 22:34         ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-07 22:39 ` [RFC 12/12] keys/mktme: Do not revoke in use " Alison Schofield
2018-09-10  1:10 ` [RFC 00/12] Multi-Key Total Memory Encryption API (MKTME) Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 19:10   ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11  3:15     ` Huang, Kai
2018-09-10 17:29 ` Sakkinen, Jarkko
2018-09-11 22:03 ` [RFC 11/12] keys/mktme: Add a new key service type for memory encryption keys David Howells
2018-09-11 22:39   ` Alison Schofield
2018-09-11 23:01   ` David Howells
2018-09-11 22:56 ` [RFC 04/12] x86/mm: Add helper functions to manage " David Howells
2018-09-12 11:12 ` [RFC 12/12] keys/mktme: Do not revoke in use " David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=105F7BF4D0229846AF094488D65A098935426D55@PGSMSX112.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox