linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Ding Hui <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/hwpoison: mf_mutex for soft offline and unpoison
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:09:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10577ef3-57c4-b1eb-cd0f-40518dfd9ad0@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211115084006.3728254-2-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>

On 11/15/21 00:40, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> 
> Originally mf_mutex is introduced to serialize multiple MCE events, but
> it is not that useful to allow unpoison to run in parallel with memory_failure()
> and soft offline.  So apply mf_mutex to soft offline and unpoison.
> The memory failure handler and soft offline handler get simpler with this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
> ---
> ChangeLog v4:
> - fix type in commit description.
> 
> ChangeLog v3:
> - merge with "mm/hwpoison: remove race consideration"
> - update description
> 
> ChangeLog v2:
> - add mutex_unlock() in "page already poisoned" path in soft_offline_page().
>   (Thanks to Ding Hui)
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 62 +++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index e8c38e27b753..d29c79de6034 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c

Thanks for working on this.  I tried to exercise memory error handling for
hugetlb pages and ran into issues addressed by these patches.

> @@ -1507,14 +1507,6 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>  	lock_page(head);
>  	page_flags = head->flags;
>  
> -	if (!PageHWPoison(head)) {
> -		pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: just unpoisoned\n", pfn);
> -		num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> -		unlock_page(head);
> -		put_page(head);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * TODO: hwpoison for pud-sized hugetlb doesn't work right now, so
>  	 * simply disable it. In order to make it work properly, we need
> @@ -1628,6 +1620,8 @@ static int memory_failure_dev_pagemap(unsigned long pfn, int flags,
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(mf_mutex);

There are only two places other places where PageHWPoison is modified without
the mutex.  They are:
- test_and_clear_pmem_poison
  I 'think' pmem error handling is done separately so this does not apply.
- clear_hwpoisoned_pages
  Called before removing memory (and deleting memmap) to reconcile count
  of poisoned pages.  Should not be an issue and technically I do not think
  the ClearPageHWPoison() is actually needed in this routine.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
-- 
Mike Kravetz


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-21  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-15  8:40 [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/hwpoison: fix unpoison_memory() Naoya Horiguchi
2021-11-15  8:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/hwpoison: mf_mutex for soft offline and unpoison Naoya Horiguchi
2022-01-21  0:09   ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2022-01-21 18:59     ` Mike Kravetz
2022-01-24  6:37       ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2021-11-15  8:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/hwpoison: remove MF_MSG_BUDDY_2ND and MF_MSG_POISONED_HUGE Naoya Horiguchi
2022-01-21  0:35   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-11-15  8:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/hwpoison: fix unpoison_memory() Naoya Horiguchi
2021-11-15 19:10   ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10577ef3-57c4-b1eb-cd0f-40518dfd9ad0@oracle.com \
    --to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dinghui@sangfor.com.cn \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox