From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: 2.5.70-mm9 From: Mingming Cao In-Reply-To: <3EEBF2C1.4050101@cyberone.com.au> References: <20030613013337.1a6789d9.akpm@digeo.com> <3EEAD41B.2090709@us.ibm.com> <20030614010139.2f0f1348.akpm@digeo.com> <1055637690.1396.15.camel@w-ming2.beaverton.ibm.com> <3EEBF2C1.4050101@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 16 Jun 2003 09:25:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1055780739.23880.439.camel@w-ming.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 21:14, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Mingming Cao wrote: > > >But the test on elevator=as (2.5.70-mm9 kernel) still failed, same > >problem. Some fsx tests are sleeping on io_schedule(). > > > > So by failed, you just mean stuck in io_schedule? Are you sure > they are permanently stuck there? Is any progress being made? > I have tried this test, and often some or most of the processes > wait in io_schedule for a while, but do get woken. > Yes, I mean they are permanetly hang there with Status D. No progress were made. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org