From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm8 From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <17990000.1053670694@[10.10.2.4]> References: <20030522021652.6601ed2b.akpm@digeo.com> <17990000.1053670694@[10.10.2.4]> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1053673399.1547.27.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 23 May 2003 00:03:20 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Andrew Morton , lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 23:18, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > 1004 2.0% default_idle > 272 8.3% __copy_from_user_ll > 129 1.7% __d_lookup > 79 7.5% link_path_walk I have to wonder if these are cache effects, or just noise. Can you give oprofile a try with one of the cache performance counters? -- Dave Hansen haveblue@us.ibm.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org