From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] dirty bit clearing on s390. From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20030522112000.GA2597@mschwid3.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20030522112000.GA2597@mschwid3.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eIYQvzJ2RzM2EzY3iBVw" Message-Id: <1053603729.2360.0.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 22 May 2003 13:42:09 +0200 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@digeo.com, phillips@arcor.de List-ID: --=-eIYQvzJ2RzM2EzY3iBVw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 13:20, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > Our solution is to move the clearing of the storage key (dirty bit) > from set_pte to SetPageUptodate. A patch that implements this is > attached. What do you think ? Is there anything that prevents a thread mmaping the page to redirty it before the kernel marks it uptodate ?=20 --=-eIYQvzJ2RzM2EzY3iBVw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+zLeRxULwo51rQBIRAnkRAJ4sYlnnpkkR1USZP5T1WrFCM3tquwCfc3FN qjXVRtN9xqsZXMvxNN3Bias= =Leyg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eIYQvzJ2RzM2EzY3iBVw-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org