From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] memcg: use mod_node_page_state to update stats
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 18:35:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052a452-9ba3-4da7-be47-7d27d27b3d1d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110232008.1352063-2-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
On 11/11/25 4:50 am, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> The memcg stats are safe against irq (and nmi) context and thus does not
> require disabling irqs. However some code paths for memcg stats also
> update the node level stats and use irq unsafe interface and thus
> require the users to disable irqs. However node level stats, on
> architectures with HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL (all major ones), has interface
> which does not require irq disabling. Let's move memcg stats code to
> start using that interface for node level stats.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
> ---
Hello Shakeel,
We are seeing a regression in micromm/munmap benchmark with this patch, on arm64 -
the benchmark mmmaps a lot of memory, memsets it, and measures the time taken
to munmap. Please see below if my understanding of this patch is correct.
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/vmstat.h | 4 ++--
> mm/memcontrol.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 8c0f15e5978f..f82fac2fd988 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -1408,7 +1408,7 @@ static inline void __mod_lruvec_kmem_state(void *p, enum node_stat_item idx,
> {
> struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(p);
>
> - __mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), idx, val);
> + mod_node_page_state(page_pgdat(page), idx, val);
> }
>
> static inline void mod_lruvec_kmem_state(void *p, enum node_stat_item idx,
> diff --git a/include/linux/vmstat.h b/include/linux/vmstat.h
> index c287998908bf..11a37aaa4dd9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vmstat.h
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static inline void mod_lruvec_page_state(struct page *page,
> static inline void __mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> enum node_stat_item idx, int val)
> {
> - __mod_node_page_state(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec), idx, val);
> + mod_node_page_state(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec), idx, val);
> }
>
> static inline void mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static inline void mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> static inline void __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(struct folio *folio,
> enum node_stat_item idx, int val)
> {
> - __mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio), idx, val);
> + mod_node_page_state(folio_pgdat(folio), idx, val);
> }
See folio_remove_rmap_ptes -> __folio_mod_stat -> __lruvec_stat_mod_folio. This path now
has the unconditional overhead of doing this_cpu_try_cmpxchg(). AFAIU the purpose of
this patch was to remove local_irq_save and optimize it by using a cmpxchg atomic
(coupled with the fact that the caller will have ensured preempt_disable), but
there are code paths which are not doing local_irq_save in the first place, so
those get regressed.
>
> static inline void lruvec_stat_mod_folio(struct folio *folio,
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 025da46d9959..f4b8a6414ed3 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ void __mod_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
> int val)
> {
> /* Update node */
> - __mod_node_page_state(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec), idx, val);
> + mod_node_page_state(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec), idx, val);
>
> /* Update memcg and lruvec */
> if (!mem_cgroup_disabled())
> @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ void __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(struct folio *folio, enum node_stat_item idx,
> /* Untracked pages have no memcg, no lruvec. Update only the node */
> if (!memcg) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> - __mod_node_page_state(pgdat, idx, val);
> + mod_node_page_state(pgdat, idx, val);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ void __mod_lruvec_kmem_state(void *p, enum node_stat_item idx, int val)
> * vmstats to keep it correct for the root memcg.
> */
> if (!memcg) {
> - __mod_node_page_state(pgdat, idx, val);
> + mod_node_page_state(pgdat, idx, val);
> } else {
> lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
> __mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, idx, val);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 23:20 [PATCH 0/4] memcg: cleanup the memcg stats interfaces Shakeel Butt
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: use mod_node_page_state to update stats Shakeel Butt
2025-11-11 1:39 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 18:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2026-01-29 13:05 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-02-02 4:26 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-02 4:48 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-02 4:54 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-02 8:53 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-04 20:38 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-05 5:20 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-05 5:45 ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-05 5:58 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-10 7:38 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-10 16:29 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-11 7:37 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-11 8:53 ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-11 9:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-02-11 10:14 ` Harry Yoo
2026-02-12 5:16 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-12 5:14 ` Dev Jain
2026-02-12 1:31 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: remove __mod_lruvec_kmem_state Shakeel Butt
2025-11-11 1:46 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 8:23 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 18:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] memcg: remove __mod_lruvec_state Shakeel Butt
2025-11-11 5:21 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 18:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: remove __lruvec_stat_mod_folio Shakeel Butt
2025-11-11 5:41 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 18:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-11 0:59 ` [PATCH 0/4] memcg: cleanup the memcg stats interfaces Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 2:23 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 2:39 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-11 2:48 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 3:00 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-11 3:07 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 3:18 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 3:29 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 3:05 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 8:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-11 8:36 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 16:45 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-12 2:11 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 9:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-11 19:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-11-11 19:34 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-15 19:27 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1052a452-9ba3-4da7-be47-7d27d27b3d1d@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox