On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 15:15, Andrew Morton wrote: > "David S. Miller" wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 09:21, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > I am also seeing this on 69-bk (as of Sunday morning) > > ... > > > On May 10, 2003 11:19 pm, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > > I looked at my logs and found the following error in it. My kernel is > > > > 69-mm3 with two davem fixes on it. > > ... > > > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: Call Trace: > > > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: [__slab_error+30/32] __slab_error+0x1e/0x20 > > > > May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: [check_poison_obj+376/384] > > > > check_poison_obj+0x178/0x180 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: > > > > [kmalloc+221/392] kmalloc+0xdd/0x188 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: > > > > [alloc_skb+64/240] alloc_skb+0x40/0xf0 May 10 22:41:06 oscar kernel: > > > > Yeah, more bugs in the NAT netfilter changes. Debugging this one > > patch is becomming a full time job :-( > > > > This should fix it. Rusty, you're computing checksums and mangling > > src/dst using header pointers potentially pointing to free'd skbs. > > > > Did you mean to send a one megabyte diff? Let's try this again, here is the correct patch :-) -- David S. Miller