From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: 2.5.68-mm4 From: Andy Pfiffer In-Reply-To: <1051910420.2166.55.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> References: <20030502020149.1ec3e54f.akpm@digeo.com> <1051905879.2166.34.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030502133405.57207c48.akpm@digeo.com> <1051908541.2166.40.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> <20030502140508.02d13449.akpm@digeo.com> <1051910420.2166.55.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1051912190.14310.2.camel@andyp.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 02 May 2003 14:49:50 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Steven Cole Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > > > > I found that e100 failed to bring up the > > > > interface on restart ("failed selftest"), but eepro100 was OK. > Here is a snippet from dmesg output for a successful kexec e100 boot: Any chance we could get lspci output from both of these systems? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org