linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] mm: Batch-copy PTE ranges during fork()
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:00:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <104de2d6-ecf9-4b0c-a982-5bd8e1aea758@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a12ce4f8-feb0-4e35-8f55-9270fe5a808b@redhat.com>

On 04.12.23 16:47, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 04.12.23 11:54, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Convert copy_pte_range() to copy a set of ptes in a batch. A given batch
>> maps a physically contiguous block of memory, all belonging to the same
>> folio. This will likely improve performance by a tiny amount due to
>> batching the folio reference count management and calling set_ptes()
>> rather than making individual calls to set_pte_at().
>>
>> However, the primary motivation for this change is to reduce the number
>> of tlb maintenance operations that the arm64 backend has to perform
>> during fork, as it is about to add transparent support for the
>> "contiguous bit" in its ptes. By write-protecting the parent using the
>> new ptep_set_wrprotects() (note the 's' at the end) function, the
>> backend can avoid having to unfold contig ranges of PTEs, which is
>> expensive, when all ptes in the range are being write-protected.
>> Similarly, by using set_ptes() rather than set_pte_at() to set up ptes
>> in the child, the backend does not need to fold a contiguous range once
>> they are all populated - they can be initially populated as a contiguous
>> range in the first place.
>>
>> This change addresses the core-mm refactoring only, and introduces
>> ptep_set_wrprotects() with a default implementation that calls
>> ptep_set_wrprotect() for each pte in the range. A separate change will
>> implement ptep_set_wrprotects() in the arm64 backend to realize the
>> performance improvement as part of the work to enable contpte mappings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> ---
>>    include/linux/pgtable.h |  13 +++
>>    mm/memory.c             | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>    2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> index af7639c3b0a3..1c50f8a0fdde 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
>> @@ -622,6 +622,19 @@ static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addres
>>    }
>>    #endif
>>    
>> +#ifndef ptep_set_wrprotects
>> +struct mm_struct;
>> +static inline void ptep_set_wrprotects(struct mm_struct *mm,
>> +				unsigned long address, pte_t *ptep,
>> +				unsigned int nr)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, address += PAGE_SIZE, ptep++)
>> +		ptep_set_wrprotect(mm, address, ptep);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>>    /*
>>     * On some architectures hardware does not set page access bit when accessing
>>     * memory page, it is responsibility of software setting this bit. It brings
>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>> index 1f18ed4a5497..8a87a488950c 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -924,68 +924,162 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
>>    	return 0;
>>    }
>>    
>> +static int folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(struct folio *folio,
>> +				      struct page *page, pte_t *pte,
>> +				      unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> +				      pte_t ptent, bool enforce_uffd_wp,
>> +				      int *dirty_nr, int *writable_nr)
>> +{
>> +	int floops;
>> +	int i;
>> +	unsigned long pfn;
>> +	bool prot_none;
>> +	bool uffd_wp;
>> +
>> +	if (!folio_test_large(folio))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Loop either to `end` or to end of folio if its contiguously mapped,
>> +	 * whichever is smaller.
>> +	 */
>> +	floops = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +	floops = min_t(int, floops,
>> +		       folio_pfn(folio_next(folio)) - page_to_pfn(page));
>> +
>> +	pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> +	prot_none = pte_protnone(ptent);
>> +	uffd_wp = pte_uffd_wp(ptent);
>> +
>> +	*dirty_nr = !!pte_dirty(ptent);
>> +	*writable_nr = !!pte_write(ptent);
>> +
>> +	pfn++;
>> +	pte++;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 1; i < floops; i++) {
>> +		ptent = ptep_get(pte);
>> +
>> +		if (!pte_present(ptent) || pte_pfn(ptent) != pfn ||
>> +		    prot_none != pte_protnone(ptent) ||
>> +		    (enforce_uffd_wp && uffd_wp != pte_uffd_wp(ptent)))
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		if (pte_dirty(ptent))
>> +			(*dirty_nr)++;
>> +		if (pte_write(ptent))
>> +			(*writable_nr)++;
>> +
>> +		pfn++;
>> +		pte++;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return i;
>> +}
>> +
>>    /*
>> - * Copy one pte.  Returns 0 if succeeded, or -EAGAIN if one preallocated page
>> - * is required to copy this pte.
>> + * Copy set of contiguous ptes.  Returns number of ptes copied if succeeded
>> + * (always gte 1), or -EAGAIN if one preallocated page is required to copy the
>> + * first pte.
>>     */
>>    static inline int
>> -copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>> -		 pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
>> -		 struct folio **prealloc)
>> +copy_present_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>> +		  pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte,
>> +		  unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>> +		  int *rss, struct folio **prealloc)
>>    {
>>    	struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
>>    	unsigned long vm_flags = src_vma->vm_flags;
>>    	pte_t pte = ptep_get(src_pte);
>>    	struct page *page;
>>    	struct folio *folio;
>> +	int nr = 1;
>> +	bool anon = false;
>> +	bool enforce_uffd_wp = userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma);
>> +	int nr_dirty = !!pte_dirty(pte);
>> +	int nr_writable = !!pte_write(pte);
>> +	int i, ret;
>>    
>>    	page = vm_normal_page(src_vma, addr, pte);
>> -	if (page)
>> +	if (page) {
>>    		folio = page_folio(page);
>> -	if (page && folio_test_anon(folio)) {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * If this page may have been pinned by the parent process,
>> -		 * copy the page immediately for the child so that we'll always
>> -		 * guarantee the pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
>> -		 * future.
>> -		 */
>> -		folio_get(folio);
>> -		if (unlikely(page_try_dup_anon_rmap(page, false, src_vma))) {
>> -			/* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
>> -			folio_put(folio);
>> -			return copy_present_page(dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte, src_pte,
>> -						 addr, rss, prealloc, page);
>> +		anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
>> +		nr = folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(folio, page, src_pte, addr, end,
>> +						pte, enforce_uffd_wp, &nr_dirty,
>> +						&nr_writable);
>> +		folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, page++) {
>> +			if (anon) {
>> +				/*
>> +				 * If this page may have been pinned by the
>> +				 * parent process, copy the page immediately for
>> +				 * the child so that we'll always guarantee the
>> +				 * pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
>> +				 * future.
>> +				 */
>> +				if (unlikely(page_try_dup_anon_rmap(
>> +						page, false, src_vma))) {
>> +					if (i != 0)
>> +						break;
>> +					/* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
>> +					folio_ref_sub(folio, nr);
>> +					ret = copy_present_page(
>> +						dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte,
>> +						src_pte, addr, rss, prealloc,
>> +						page);
>> +					return ret == 0 ? 1 : ret;
>> +				}
>> +				rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
>> +				VM_BUG_ON(PageAnonExclusive(page));
>> +			} else {
>> +				page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
>> +				rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
>> +			}
>>    		}
>> -		rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
>> -	} else if (page) {
>> -		folio_get(folio);
>> -		page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
>> -		rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
>> -	}
> 
> This likely looks a lot neater if you keep the existing structure.
> 
> For example, you can simply have on the !anon path
> 
> } else if (page) {
> 	folio = page_folio(page);
> 	nr = folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped ...
> 	folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
> 	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, page++)
> 		page_dup_file_rmap(page, false);
> 	rss[mm_counter_file(&folio->page)] += nr;
> }
> 

With rmap batching from [1] -- rebased+changed on top of that -- we could turn
that into an effective (untested):

         if (page && folio_test_anon(folio)) {
+               nr = folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(folio, page, src_pte, addr, end,
+                                               pte, enforce_uffd_wp, &nr_dirty,
+                                               &nr_writable);
                 /*
                  * If this page may have been pinned by the parent process,
                  * copy the page immediately for the child so that we'll always
                  * guarantee the pinned page won't be randomly replaced in the
                  * future.
                  */
-               folio_get(folio);
-               if (unlikely(folio_try_dup_anon_rmap_pte(folio, page, src_vma))) {
+               folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
+               if (unlikely(folio_try_dup_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, page, nr, src_vma))) {
                         /* Page may be pinned, we have to copy. */
-                       folio_put(folio);
-                       return copy_present_page(dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte, src_pte,
-                                                addr, rss, prealloc, page);
+                       folio_ref_sub(folio, nr);
+                       ret = copy_present_page(dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte,
+                                               src_pte, addr, rss, prealloc,
+                                               page);
+                       return ret == 0 ? 1 : ret;
                 }
-               rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
+               rss[MM_ANONPAGES] += nr;
         } else if (page) {
-               folio_get(folio);
-               folio_dup_file_rmap_pte(folio, page);
-               rss[mm_counter_file(page)]++;
+               nr = folio_nr_pages_cont_mapped(folio, page, src_pte, addr, end,
+                                               pte, enforce_uffd_wp, &nr_dirty,
+                                               &nr_writable);
+               folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
+               folio_dup_file_rmap_ptes(folio, page, nr);
+               rss[mm_counter_file(page)] += nr;
         }


We'll have to test performance, but it could be that we want to specialize
more on !folio_test_large(). That code is very performance-sensitive.


[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231204142146.91437-1-david@redhat.com

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-04 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-04 10:54 [PATCH v3 00/15] Transparent Contiguous PTEs for User Mappings Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] mm: Batch-copy PTE ranges during fork() Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 15:47   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-04 16:00     ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-12-04 17:27       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-05 11:30         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-05 12:04           ` David Hildenbrand
2023-12-05 14:16             ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-08  0:32   ` Alistair Popple
2023-12-12 11:51     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] mm: Batch-clear PTE ranges during zap_pte_range() Ryan Roberts
2023-12-08  1:30   ` Alistair Popple
2023-12-12 11:57     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] arm64/mm: set_pte(): New layer to manage contig bit Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] arm64/mm: set_ptes()/set_pte_at(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] arm64/mm: pte_clear(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] arm64/mm: ptep_get_and_clear(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] arm64/mm: ptep_test_and_clear_young(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] arm64/mm: ptep_clear_flush_young(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] arm64/mm: ptep_set_wrprotect(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] arm64/mm: ptep_set_access_flags(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] arm64/mm: ptep_get(): " Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] arm64/mm: Split __flush_tlb_range() to elide trailing DSB Ryan Roberts
2023-12-12 11:35   ` Will Deacon
2023-12-12 11:47     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-14 11:53       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-14 12:13         ` Will Deacon
2023-12-14 12:30           ` Robin Murphy
2023-12-14 14:28             ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-14 15:22             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2023-12-14 16:45               ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] arm64/mm: Wire up PTE_CONT for user mappings Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] arm64/mm: Implement ptep_set_wrprotects() to optimize fork() Ryan Roberts
2023-12-08  1:37   ` Alistair Popple
2023-12-12 11:59     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-15  4:32       ` Alistair Popple
2023-12-15 14:05         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-04 10:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] arm64/mm: Implement clear_ptes() to optimize exit() Ryan Roberts
2023-12-08  1:45   ` Alistair Popple
2023-12-12 12:02     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-12-05  3:41 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] Transparent Contiguous PTEs for User Mappings John Hubbard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=104de2d6-ecf9-4b0c-a982-5bd8e1aea758@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox