From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2
Date: 20 Mar 2003 07:36:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048170972.4302.119.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303192327.45883.tomlins@cam.org>
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 21:27, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On March 19, 2003 06:45 pm, Steven P. Cole wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote:
> > > > > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle
> > > > > tests were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be
> > > > > desired.
> > > >
> > > > Replying to myself for a followup,
> > > >
> > > > I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the
> > > > situation was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the
> > > > response to desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over
> > > > running dbench on reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long
> > > > delays with dbench clients greater than 16.
> > >
> > > OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce
> > > this:
> > >
> > > Does reverting
> > >
> > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-ou
> > >t/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch
> > >
> > > help?
> >
> > Sorry, didn't have much time for a lot of testing, but no miracles
> > occurred. With 5 minutes of testing 2.5.65-mm2 and dbench 24 on ext3
> > and that patch reverted (first hunk had to be manually fixed), I don't
> > see any improvement. Still the same long long delays in trying to use
> > Evolution.
>
> Steven,
>
> Do things improve with the patch below applied? You have to backout the
> schedule-tuneables patch before appling it.
>
> Ed Tomlinson
[patch snipped]
I tried that patch, and the bad behavior with the Evolution "Compose a
Message" window remains. With a load of dbench 12, I had stalls of many
seconds before I could type something. Also, here is an additional
symptom. If I move the Evolution "Compose" window around rapidly, it
leaves a smear of itself on the screen under itself. With all -mm2
variants, this smear stays for an intolerably long time (tens of
seconds) while that window does not record keyboard strokes. 2.5.65-bk
on the other hand exhibits much more benign behavior. Under similar
load, the smear disappears in a few seconds and the window starts
responding to keyboard events. I just now rebooted 2.5-bk to verify,
and it is still responsive at dbench client loads which would make
Evolution unusable with 2.5.65-mm2. Mozilla, on the other hand, still
works OK under load with -mm2. This was all with dbench running on
ext3.
I won't be able to do any more testing for several hours, so have fun!
Steven
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-20 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-19 9:21 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 10:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 19:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-19 20:10 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 20:57 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:02 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 0:33 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 23:45 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 4:27 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-20 5:04 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 14:36 ` Steven Cole [this message]
2003-03-20 19:48 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 20:12 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 21:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 21:15 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-21 5:20 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-21 6:06 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-21 6:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303210710490.2533-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-22 19:50 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1048170972.4302.119.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov \
--to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tomlins@cam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox