linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2
Date: 20 Mar 2003 07:36:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048170972.4302.119.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303192327.45883.tomlins@cam.org>

On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 21:27, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On March 19, 2003 06:45 pm, Steven P. Cole wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote:
> > > > > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle
> > > > > tests were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be
> > > > > desired.
> > > >
> > > > Replying to myself for a followup,
> > > >
> > > > I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the
> > > > situation was similar to elevator=as.  Running dbench on ext3, the
> > > > response to desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over
> > > > running dbench on reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long
> > > > delays with dbench clients greater than 16.
> > >
> > > OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce
> > > this:
> > >
> > > Does reverting
> > >
> > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-ou
> > >t/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch
> > >
> > > help?
> >
> > Sorry, didn't have much time for a lot of testing, but no miracles
> > occurred.  With 5 minutes of testing 2.5.65-mm2 and dbench 24 on ext3
> > and that patch reverted (first hunk had to be manually fixed), I don't
> > see any improvement.  Still the same long long delays in trying to use
> > Evolution.
> 
> Steven,
> 
> Do things improve with the patch below applied?  You have to backout the 
> schedule-tuneables patch before appling it.
> 
> Ed Tomlinson

[patch snipped]

I tried that patch, and the bad behavior with the Evolution "Compose a
Message" window remains.  With a load of dbench 12, I had stalls of many
seconds before I could type something.  Also, here is an additional
symptom.  If I move the Evolution "Compose" window around rapidly, it
leaves a smear of itself on the screen under itself.  With all -mm2
variants, this smear stays for an intolerably long time (tens of
seconds) while that window does not record keyboard strokes.  2.5.65-bk
on the other hand exhibits much more benign behavior.  Under similar
load, the smear disappears in a few seconds and the window starts
responding to keyboard events.  I just now rebooted 2.5-bk to verify,
and it is still responsive at dbench client loads which would make
Evolution unusable with 2.5.65-mm2.  Mozilla, on the other hand, still
works OK under load with -mm2.  This was all with dbench running on
ext3.

I won't be able to do any more testing for several hours, so have fun!

Steven

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-20 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-19  9:21 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 10:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 19:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-19 20:10   ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 20:57     ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:02       ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20  0:33         ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 23:45           ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20  4:27             ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-20  5:04               ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 14:36               ` Steven Cole [this message]
2003-03-20 19:48                 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 20:12                   ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 21:07                     ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 21:15                       ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-21  5:20                         ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-21  6:06                   ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-21  6:16                   ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
     [not found]                   ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303210710490.2533-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-22 19:50                     ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1048170972.4302.119.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov \
    --to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tomlins@cam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox