linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2
Date: 19 Mar 2003 22:04:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048136698.10011.1736.camel@spc1.mesatop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303192327.45883.tomlins@cam.org>

On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 21:27, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> On March 19, 2003 06:45 pm, Steven P. Cole wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote:
> > > > > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle
> > > > > tests were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be
> > > > > desired.
> > > >
> > > > Replying to myself for a followup,
> > > >
> > > > I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the
> > > > situation was similar to elevator=as.  Running dbench on ext3, the
> > > > response to desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over
> > > > running dbench on reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long
> > > > delays with dbench clients greater than 16.
> > >
> > > OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce
> > > this:
> > >
> > > Does reverting
> > >
> > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-ou
> > >t/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch
> > >
> > > help?
> >
> > Sorry, didn't have much time for a lot of testing, but no miracles
> > occurred.  With 5 minutes of testing 2.5.65-mm2 and dbench 24 on ext3
> > and that patch reverted (first hunk had to be manually fixed), I don't
> > see any improvement.  Still the same long long delays in trying to use
> > Evolution.
> 
> Steven,
> 
> Do things improve with the patch below applied?  You have to backout the 
> schedule-tuneables patch before appling it.

I take it this is the one to back out?
scheduler-tunables.patch 17-Mar-2003 22:01    11k

> 
> Ed Tomlinson

I'll give it a shot when I get the chance.  Unfortunately, I'm bogged
down with meetings tomorrow morning, so it will be at least 14-15 hours
from now.  Perhaps some other adventurous person can pick up the ball in
the meantime.

My test system is 933Mhz PIII, IDE, 256MB. The apps are Mozilla 1.3 and
Evolution 1.2.2 running under KDE 3.1.

Thanks,
Steven

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-20  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-19  9:21 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 10:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 19:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-19 20:10   ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 20:57     ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:02       ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20  0:33         ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 23:45           ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20  4:27             ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-20  5:04               ` Steven Cole [this message]
2003-03-20 14:36               ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 19:48                 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 20:12                   ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 21:07                     ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 21:15                       ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-21  5:20                         ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-21  6:06                   ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-21  6:16                   ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
     [not found]                   ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303210710490.2533-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-22 19:50                     ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1048136698.10011.1736.camel@spc1.mesatop.com \
    --to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tomlins@cam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox