From: "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm2
Date: 19 Mar 2003 16:45:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048117516.1602.6.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030319163337.602160d8.akpm@digeo.com>
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle tests
> > > were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be desired.
> >
> > Replying to myself for a followup,
> >
> > I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the situation
> > was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the response to
> > desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over running dbench on
> > reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long delays with dbench
> > clients greater than 16.
>
> OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce this:
>
> Does reverting
>
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-out/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch
>
> help?
Sorry, didn't have much time for a lot of testing, but no miracles
occurred. With 5 minutes of testing 2.5.65-mm2 and dbench 24 on ext3
and that patch reverted (first hunk had to be manually fixed), I don't
see any improvement. Still the same long long delays in trying to use
Evolution.
Steven
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-19 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-19 9:21 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 10:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 10:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-03-19 19:51 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-19 20:10 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 20:57 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-19 22:02 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 0:33 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Andrew Morton
2003-03-19 23:45 ` Steven P. Cole [this message]
2003-03-20 4:27 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-20 5:04 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 14:36 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven Cole
2003-03-20 19:48 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 20:12 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-20 21:07 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-20 21:15 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Steven P. Cole
2003-03-21 5:20 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
2003-03-21 6:06 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-21 6:16 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303210710490.2533-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-22 19:50 ` 2.5.65-mm2 Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1048117516.1602.6.camel@spc1.esa.lanl.gov \
--to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox